Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Analysis of the Criminal Case Transfer Procedure from Investigators to Public Prosecutors in the Prosecution Stage (Stage II) Manurung, Berliana Feronika; Siregar, Hisar
The Future of Education Journal Vol 4 No 8 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v4i8.1042

Abstract

In the Indonesian criminal justice system, there are several stages in the mechanism for handling a criminal case. The first stage is the examination, also known as the investigation and inquiry conducted by the police, which is then transferred to the prosecutor's office for further investigation and finally to the process of transfer to the court and finally to trial. The purpose of this study is to determine the procedure for transferring criminal cases from investigators to public prosecutors in stage II according to the Criminal Procedure Code and the procedure for handing over and investigating suspects by investigators to prosecutors in a brief examination procedure. The method used is a qualitative method. The results of this study are about how the case examination procedure according to the Criminal Procedure Code and how the procedure for transferring cases in a brief examination procedure. First, the Case Examination Procedure according to the Criminal Procedure Code in Chapter XVI differentiates the case examination procedure in district court trials. Basically, the starting point for this difference in examination procedures is reviewed from the type of crime being tried on one side and from the ease or difficulty of proving the case in question on the other side, the Procedure for Transferring Cases in a Brief Examination Procedure. Regarding the brief examination procedure, in the Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 8 of 1981), it is regulated in Articles 203 and 204. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the procedure for brief case examination is generally guided by the ordinary examination procedure. The Criminal Procedure Code does not provide limitations on which cases are included in the ordinary examination. In the examination of cases in the brief examination procedure, the public prosecutor does not make an indictment but the public prosecutor immediately after the defendant in court answers the questions then informs the defendant verbally from his notes about the crime charged to him by explaining the time, place and circumstances when the crime was committed.
Efektifitas Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang Dalam Perjanjian Franchise (Waralaba):Analisis Penyalahgunaan Resep Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 (Studi Kasus: PT Chicken Holic Indonesia) Manurung, Berliana Feronika; Anggusti, Martono; Siregar, Ria Juliana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i3.7974

Abstract

Perkembangan sistem waralaba (franchise) sebagai salah satu model kerja sama bisnis modern menempatkan rahasia dagang, khususnya resep dan sistem operasional, sebagai aset strategis memiliki nilai ekonomi tinggi. Hubungan hukum antara franchisor dan franchise didasarkan pada perjanjian franchise yang bersifat innominaat dan tunduk pada ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, sekaligus berada dalam rezim perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 Tentang Rahasia Dagang. Permasalahan muncul ketika terjadi penyalahgunaan resep oleh franchise, yang tidak hanya menimbulkan wanprestasi kontraktual, tetapi juga berpotensi dikualifikasikan sebagai pelanggaran rahasia dagang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap franchisor dan franchise dalam perjanjian franchise PT Chicken Holic Indonesia serta mengkaji mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa atas penyalahgunaan resep berdasarkan Pasal 11 dan Pasal 12 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000. Mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa dapat ditempuh melalui jalur perdata, arbitrase atau alternatif penyelesaian sengketa, serta jalur pidana, yang masing-masing memiliki fungsi perlindungan hukum yang saling melengkapi