Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Strategi Efektif bagi Widyaiswara: Analisis Hambatan dan Solusi untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Publikasi Ilmiah Widyaiswara Sukoco, Sutrisno Heru; Kamaliah, Naily; Fadila Juliana Rahman, Alpha
Jurnal Edutrained : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Edutrained : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pelatihan
Publisher : Balai Diklat Keagamaan Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37730/edutrained.v8i1.296

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the obstacles and solutions faced by educators (widyaiswara) in improving the productivity of scientific publications. The research method employed is analytical descriptive, utilizing online questionnaires for data collection. The primary respondents are 40 educators participating in scientific publication pilot training. Data analysis involves descriptive statistics, multinomial logistic regression, and Fisher exact test. The research findings indicate that 50% of educators mention time constraints, 17.5% cite laziness, and 15% identify a lack of references as obstacles. The proposed solutions to overcome these obstacles involve the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Regarding the use of references in scholarly literature, educators are deemed proficient in selecting reference sources. However, there is room for improvement in the optimal utilization of scientific reference tools, with 66% of educators not yet utilizing reference management applications in their scientific publications. This research provides insights into challenges and recommended solutions for enhancing the productivity of scientific publications for educators. The promotion of AI utilization, modern applications, and tools for academic reference searches needs continuous advocacy. Participation in training, joining Communities of Practice (CoP), and self-directed learning in scientific writing can serve as solutions for educators to boost motivation and improve the quality of their research and resulting publications.
Design vs Report: How Research Design Choices Predict Quality of Scientific Papers in Paper Writing Training Kamaliah, Naily; Fadila Juliana Rahman, Alpha; Heru Sukoco, Sutrisno; Indah Rahayu, Dwi
Monas: Jurnal Inovasi Aparatur Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54849/monas.v7i2.279

Abstract

This study examines the alignment between planned research designs and final Scientific Paper (KTI) reports produced by participants of basic-level KTI training (N = 160 participants; 80 teams) during 2023–2024, and tests whether design elements and participants’ substantive understanding predict paper quality and presentation. We coded concordance between planned and implemented elements (problem formulation, data source, analysis method) and analyzed associations using Fisher’s exact tests, logistic regression for binary outcomes, and linear regression for presentation scores. Results show that 44.8% of teams produced KTIs fully concordant with their designs; 32.5% of teams moved from descriptive designs to include inferential analysis in final KTIs. Concordance of analysis method (design to implementation) was the only design element that significantly predicted substantive-quality scores (p = 0.029). Participants’ substantive-understanding scores predicted presentation quality (β = X, p = 0.013). We discuss implications for training curricula and recommend embedding method-focused mentoring and assessment checkpoints.