Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

RnD model ADDIE sebagai metode pengembangan Virtual Tour 360 Istana Siak Sri Indrapura Fadhillah, Rizki Rahmali; Putra, Zetra Hainul; Hermita, Neni; Copriady, Jimmy
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i3.19578

Abstract

Research and Development (RnD) is a systematic approach tocreating and developing educational products based on the actualneeds in the field. One of the most widely used models in R&D development is the ADDIE instructional design model, whichconsists of five main stages: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. This article comprehensivelydiscusses the basic theory, advantages, disadvantages, andapplication of the ADDIE model in the context of formal and non-formal education development. Through several reviews ofvarious national and international studies, it can be found thatthe ADDIE model is very effective in improving the quality oflearning, integrating technology, and is relevant to variousaspects, including for students with special needs and vocationaleducation. With a highly flexible and evaluative structure, ADDIE has become one of the leading models in the systematic, efficient, and adaptive design of educational products in response to thedevelopment of time and technology.
HOTS Question Analysis in Elementary Mathematics: Focus on Fractions, Geometry, and Comparison Topics in 6th Grade Fadhillah, Rizki Rahmali; Agustin, Erza Mulia; Ramadhanti, Astrid; Alim, Jesi Alexander; Fendrik, Muhammad
Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Research, Training and Philanthropy Institution Natural Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51276/edu.v7i1.1367

Abstract

This study aims to determine the mathematical ability of sixth-grade students in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) type mathematics problems. This study is a descriptive qualitative study. The study's subjects were sixth-grade students from 3 elementary schools in Pekanbaru City. The methods used in this study include tests, interviews, and documentation. The test consisted of 15 HOTS-type mathematics verification questions. The test results were then explained and supported by interviews and student documentation. The results showed that students' abilities to solve HOTS mathematics problems across three schools differed significantly. Category A schools had an average score of 49.5, which was in the high category. Category B schools (average 20.0, medium category) and Category C schools (average 17.6) showed abilities in Fractions, Geometry, and Comparison that were in the low category. From these results, it can be seen that students have different abilities in solving problems. From the perspective of problem description and solution, students have not fully used concepts and procedures to formulate and solve problems. From a communication perspective, students have not fully written their answers coherently or provided a solution to the problem.