Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan JUSTISI Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika
Redi Pirmansyah
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Revitalisasi Konservasi Gajah Sumatera Di Way Kambas Dan Perlindungan Gajah Yang Diambang Kepunahan Redi Pirmansyah; Arifin, Zainul; Muhammad Farhan Pratama; Ummu Kaidah Mutmainnah; Muh. Syahri Ramadhan; Muhammad Rasyid
Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Dan Pengambangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jcm.v5i1.2590

Abstract

Salah satu persoalan mendasar bagi gajah sumatera adalah penurunan habitat yang semakin sedikit tiap tahunnya. Konflik gajah dengan manusia juga menyebabkan banyak gajah harus mati dan perburuan gading gajah secara illegal menyebabkan penurunan habitat gajah 70 hingga 80 persen. Gajah sumatera memerlukan berbagai kondisi dan faktor pendukung habitatnya seperti ketersediaan tempat mencari makan, penutupan tajuk sebagai tempat berlindung dan tersedianya sumber air yang melimpah. Selain itu satwa ini juga perlu pendukung habitat dan unit esensial untuk mendukung ekosistemnya. Penyempitan habitat dan tumpang tindih pemanfaatan lahan ada faktor lain yang dianggap menjadi salah satu faktor pendukung berkurangnya jumlah gajah dari tahun ke tahun. Selain itu gajah juga sangat suka dengan tanaman yang dikelola oleh masyarakat. Sebab lahan makan gajah terbatas sehingga gajah masuk dalam kebun milik masyarakat sehingga menyebabkan banyak kerusakan dan kerugian bagi penduduk.
Educators’ Perceptions of AI and ChatGPT: Comfort, Ethics, and Readiness in Teaching Khoirawati; Zaimuddin; Aidah; Sukainah; Muhammad Fairuz Fakhri; Suriati; Redi Pirmansyah
Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Tekno-Pedagogi| In Progress|
Publisher : Program Magister Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/teknopedagogi.v15i2.48756

Abstract

This study examines educators’ perceptions of AI, particularly ChatGPT, focusing on comfort, ethical considerations, and teaching readiness within teacher education. The study responds to the rapid integration of AI in education and the need for its responsible and pedagogically meaningful use. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through an online survey of 120 in-service educators from various educational levels in Indonesia, measuring technology comfort, perceived benefits and risks of AI, personal readiness, and institutional support. To deepen the findings, qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively selected participants. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, and correlation analysis, while qualitative data were analysed thematically with support from LDA topic modelling. The results show that most educators hold positive attitudes toward AI and perceive ChatGPT as useful for instructional planning, writing assistance, and feedback provision. Nevertheless, ethical concerns, particularly related to plagiarism, fairness, and student dependency, remain significant. Although educators report moderate to high personal readiness to adopt AI, institutional support in terms of clear policies, ethical guidelines, and professional development is still limited. This study underscores the importance of strengthening AI literacy, developing ethical frameworks, and enhancing institutional support to ensure the sustainable and responsible integration of AI in teacher education.
The Authority of Judges in Applying Diversion to Children Facing Criminal Charges Carrying a Sentence of More Than Seven Years Redi Pirmansyah; Arifin, Muhammad Zainul; M. Iqbal
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i1.4688

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the implementation of diversion in juvenile crimes based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law). The study method uses a normative legal method through a case study of legal behavior products. The novelty of this research lies in its in-depth analysis of the authority of judges in determining diversion for criminal acts with a maximum penalty of more than 7 years. Although normatively excluded by the UU SPPA, this is interpreted progressively using a restorative justice approach and the principle of the best interests of the child. The results of the research examine the discretion of judges in applying the principle of restorative justice in serious criminal cases that, according to the standard rules, are not eligible for diversion. Through a normative approach and empirical case studies, this research provides new insights and recommendations for reformulating more humane legal policies. The aim is to make the justice system more responsive to the protection of children's rights in accordance with national legal standards. Conclusion This study found that diversion under the SPPA is limited to criminal offenses carrying a sentence of less than seven years. However, Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 4 of 2014 expands this scope, particularly in the case of mixed charges. This regulatory discrepancy creates a dilemma for judges in determining the appropriate legal reference. This inconsistency has an impact on legal uncertainty, where similar cases can receive different diversion treatments. Therefore, harmonization between the Supreme Court regulation and the SPPA Law is urgently needed to ensure equal justice for children.
Co-Authors aidah khoirawati M. Iqbal Muh. Syahri Ramadhan Muhammad Fairuz Fakhri Muhammad Farhan Pratama muhammad rasyid Muhammad Zainul Arifin Sukainah Suriati Ummu Kaidah Mutmainnah Zaimuddin Zainul Arifin