Afrianto, Adi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mengurai Konflik Agraria di Desa Senama Nenek dengan Pendekatan Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Responses (DPSIR) Shani, Fauzan Maulana; Afrianto, Adi; Dwijananti, Bunga Mareta; Kustiwan, Iwan
Tunas Agraria Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Tunas Agraria
Publisher : Diploma IV Pertanahan Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/jta.v7i2.310

Abstract

The conflict between the indigenous community of Senama Nenek Village and PT. Perkebunan Nusantara V (PTPN V) has been ongoing for decades. This condition reflects the complexity of the conflict's issues. This research aims to analyze the conflict using the Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Responses (DPSIR) approach. The DPSIR framework highlights the causal effect relationships among aspects, starting with drivers that exert pressure on the environment, causing changes in its natural condition. These environmental changes then have impacts on ecosystems and humans. Consequently, humans adapt to cope with these changing conditions. The DPSIR approach identified the industrialization of PTPN V as one of the root causes of the conflict. This industrialization exerted pressure on the environment through the acquisition of customary lands, leading to disputes and uncertainty over the land status of the indigenous community. In response to this situation, measures were taken, including the redistribution of land to 1,385 indigenous households. We expect this DPSIR approach to serve as a tool to resolve similar conflicts in Indonesia.   Konflik antara masyarakat adat Desa Senama Nenek dengan PT. Perkebunan Nusantara V (PTPN V) berlangsung puluhan tahun. Kondisi ini menandakan kompleksitas permasalahan yang terjadi dalam konflik tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konflik dimaksud dengan pendekatan Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Responses (DPSIR). Kerangka DPSIR menyoroti hubungan sebab-akibat antar aspek, mulai dari faktor pemicu yang memberikan tekanan pada lingkungan yang menyebabkan perubahan pada lingkungan. Perubahan lingkungan tersebut kemudian memberikan dampak bagi ekosistem/manusia. Selanjutnya manusia merespon untuk mengatasi hal tersebut. Melalui pendekatan DPSIR, teridentifikasi akar penyebab konflik tersebut salah satunya adalah industrialisasi PTPN V yang memberikan tekanan terhadap lingkungan berupa penguasaan tanah ulayat oleh pihak PTPN V yang berujung sengketa dan mengakibatkan ketidakpastian status lahan masyarakat adat. Atas kondisi ini, respon yang dilakukan antara lain redistribusi tanah kepada 1.385 KK masyarakat adat. Pendekatan DPSIR ini diharapkan dapat menjadi tools untuk mengurai konflik serupa yang terjadi di Indonesia.
Menavigasi Transisi ITB Innovation Park melalui Perspektif Multi Tingkat Afrianto, Adi; Astari, Rahmita; Netra, Putri Aulia; Arisanti, Mariata; Yuliar, Sonny
Jurnal Sosioteknologi Vol. 24 No. 3 (2025): NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Seni Rupa dan Desain ITB

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5614/sostek.itbj.2025.24.3.10

Abstract

The development of the science techno park (STP) in Indonesia aims to facilitate innovation-based industrial growth. Concurrently, the Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) is committed to realizing an entrepreneurial university by leveraging research results through the ITB-STP, also known as the ITB Innovation Park (IIP). The IIP acts as an innovation center that connects research with market needs and functions as an innovation commercialization accelerator. Research using the Multi-Level Perspective Framework indicates policy shifts in STP development during the 2015– 2019 and 2020–2024 periods. Despite producing various innovative products, IIP faces challenges in transitioning the socio-technical system for commercializing research outputs, particularly in integrating with the broader regime and ensuring innovation sustainability. IIP’s initiatives demonstrate instances of fit & fit; however, during the fit & stretch phase, IIP continues to encounter challenges, particularly concerning market responses to the innovative products offered. This indicates that the stretching process remains in progress. Consequently, IIP’s success in reshaping the regime depends on enhanced collaboration, systematic innovation validation, and supportive government policies to foster the establishment of a new innovation-based regime.