Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Jurnal Hukum Statuta
Sentosa, Ummu Hani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERAMPASAN KEUNTUNGAN PERUSAHAAN SEBAGAI BENTUK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI ATAS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Fadilah, Fatma Putri; Sentosa, Ummu Hani; Rasya, Harlin Sabrinda
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Volume 4, Nomor 2, April 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v4i2.10828

Abstract

(Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has a significant impact on state finances. One of the approaches applied in efforts to eradicate corruption is profit confiscation, which is a legal mechanism that authorizes the state to confiscate profits obtained illegally by a business entity. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of the mechanism of corporate profit confiscation in the recovery of state finances due to corruption in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical method with statute approach and conceptual approach. Data is collected through literature study with primary and secondary legal sources. The results show that although profit forfeiture has been regulated in various laws and regulations, its implementation still faces obstacles, such as weak coordination between law enforcement agencies, unclear regulations, and lack of effectiveness in applying sanctions against corporations involved in corruption crimes. The implementation of profit forfeiture mechanisms in several countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, shows that this policy can be an effective instrument in recovering state assets and eradicating corporate corruption. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize regulations, increase the capacity of law enforcement officials, and strengthen inter-agency coordination so that the profit forfeiture mechanism can be applied more effectively in dealing with corruption cases in Indonesia).
Analisis Kasus Overmacht dan Pemutusan Kontrak Sepihak: Studi Putusan Nomor 672k/Pdt/2020 antara CV. Berlian Mas dan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Trenggalek Salwa, Rachel Amanda; Chandra, Restia Delya Ayu; Ilzan, Safa Aqila; Athareza, Sultan; Sentosa, Ummu Hani; Rizkianti, Wardani
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17905865

Abstract

The dispute between CV. Berlian Mas and the Regional Government of Trenggalek Regency, as reflected in Supreme Court Decision No. 672 K/Pdt/2020, stemmed from delays in the Plapar Bridge construction project, which the contractor attributed to flooding as a form of force majeure (overmacht). Although the contractor requested an extension of time, the regional government unilaterally terminated the contract without complying with the notification procedures required under the contract and procurement regulations. An assessment of Articles 1244–1245 of the Indonesian Civil Code shows that the flood did not objectively qualify as force majeure due to insufficient formal evidence and inadequate mitigation. The Supreme Court ruled that the termination constituted a breach of contract (wanprestasi), not a tort. This decision highlights the importance of strict proof of force majeure, adherence to the principle of pacta sunt servanda, and procedural compliance within government procurement contracts.
Co-Authors Athareza, Sultan Chandra, Restia Delya Ayu Fadilah, Fatma Putri Ilzan, Safa Aqila Rasya, Harlin Sabrinda Rizkianti, Wardani Salwa, Rachel Amanda