Sulistyowati, Anny
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

HUBUNGAN UKURAN PUPIL DENGAN KELAINAN REFRAKSI PADA SINDROM METABOLIK MAUPUN NON SINDROM METABOLIK PADA POPULASI DI DESA KABUPATEN MALANG Aini, Kurrotul; Sulistyowati, Anny; Vierlia, Wino Vrieda
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S1 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/ha8fm564

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the relationships between pupil size and refractive errors in both metabolic syndrome and non-metabolic syndrome populations residing in rural areas of Malang. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in 2019 across three villages in Malang districts. All attending participants underwent a comprehensive ocular examination, including pupil size assessment. Pupil abnormalities were defined as deviations from the normal diameter of 2-4 mm in bright light. Clinically relevant refractive errors included hyperopia (SphEq value ? 0.25 D), myopia (SphEq value ? -0.25 D), and astigmatism (cylinder ? 0.25 D). Blood samples gauged serum fasting glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Waist circumference, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure were measured. Metabolic Syndrome diagnosis followed the 2006 International Diabetes Foundation criteria. Participants were categorized into metabolic syndrome and non-metabolic syndrome groups. Results: The examination involved 953 participants, encompassing 944 right eyes and 942 left eyes. For the right eye, 434 eyes showed emmetropia, 252 exhibited myopia, 141 had hyperopia, and 117 presented astigmatism. Pupillary abnormalities were linked to astigmatism, but lacked significance (p = 0.893). The left eye results indicated 444 eyes with emmetropia, 244 with myopia, 138 with hyperopia, and 116 with astigmatism. Correlation with pupillary abnormalities yielded a non-significant p-value of 0.864. Pupil size outcomes in metabolic syndrome (499 eyes) and non-metabolic syndrome (454 eyes) were not significant (p = 0.649). Conclusion: Refractive error does not correlate with pupil size in metabolic syndrome and nonmetabolic syndrome.
RELATIONSHIP OF PUPIL SIZE WITH REFRACTIVE ERROR IN METABOLIC SYNDROME AND NON METABOLIC SYNDROME: AMONG RURAL POPULATION IN MALANG AINI, KURROTUL; Sulistyowati, Anny; Vierlia, Wino Vrieda; Holipah
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/n3rj1394

Abstract

Introduction & ObjectivesNearly one in four Indonesians has metabolic syndrome (MS). One of the microvascular side effectsin Metabolic Syndrome affects the eyes. The aim of this study to evaluate the relationship of pupilsize with refractive error in MS and non-MS groups among rural populations in Malang. MethodsA descriptive study was carried out in 2019 in three villages in Malang districts. A detailed ocularexamination was conducted on all participants who attended a research facility. We definedpupillary abnormalities and clinically important refractive errors. Blood samples were obtained todetermine the parameter of the metabolic syndrome by IDF 2006 criteria. Subjects were classifiedinto 2 groups: Metabolic Syndrome status and non metabolic syndrome. Results953 participants completed the examination which consists of 944 right eyes and 942 left eyes. Theresults of visual acuity on the right eye: emmetropia in 434 eyes, myopia with 252 eyes, hyperopiawith 141 eyes, and astigmatism with 17 eyes where if it is not significant if associated with pupillaryabnormalities (P-value 0.893). On the left eye, the emmetropia results were 444 eyes, while formyopia were 244 eyes, hyperopia as many as 138, and astigmatism in 116 eyes and if associatedwith pupillary abnormalities, the result also not significant (P-value 0.864). The result of pupil sizewith metabolic syndrome 499 eye and non syndrome metabolic 454 eye are not significant (p-value0.649). ConclusionRefractive error didn’t relate pupil size in metabolic syndrome and non metabolic syndrome.