Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of Contemporary Law Studies
Mokodompit, Rahmat
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Telaah Karakteristik Sistem Bikameral Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor. 92/Puu-X/2012 Mokodompit, Rahmat; Ahmad
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 5 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i5.2196

Abstract

Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari dinamika ketatanegaraan Indonesia pasca amandemen UUD 1945 yang mengubah sistem legislatif dari unikameral menjadi bikameral. Kehadiran Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) diharapkan mampu menjadi penyeimbang kekuasaan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dalam pembentukan undang-undang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis sejauh mana Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012 mengubah karakteristik sistem bikameral Indonesia dan memperkuat posisi DPD dalam fungsi legislasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif melalui analisis kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, doktrin, dan literatur akademik terkait kewenangan DPD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan tersebut memberikan penguatan pada tahap perencanaan dan pembahasan RUU, sehingga DPD memperoleh posisi sebagai co-legislator, tetapi belum mencapai level co-decision maker. Implikasinya, sistem bikameral Indonesia tetap bercorak soft bicameralism, meskipun mengalami sedikit pergeseran ke arah quasi-strong bicameralism, yang menunjukkan perlunya reformasi konstitusional untuk mencapai keseimbangan kekuasaan yang lebih efektif
Mengonseptualisasi Prinsip Meaningful Participation Melalui Kerangka Demokrasi Deliberatif Jürgen Habermas: Analisis terhadap Putusan MK No. 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Mokodompit, Rahmat; Abdussamad, Zamroni; Ahmad, Ahmad
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): November
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v3i1.5097

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the concept of public participation within Jürgen Habermas’s deliberative democracy framework by focusing on three fundamental rights: the right to be heard, the right to be considered, and the right to be given an explanation. These rights are examined as an integrated deliberative process that links the lifeworld, the public sphere, and the political system. Using a qualitative method with a theoretical approach, this study relies on an extensive literature review to interpret Habermasian deliberative democracy and to explain how citizens’ voices obtain normative legitimacy in democratic decision-making. The findings indicate that the right to be heard highlights the importance of acknowledging citizens’ lived experiences as a moral foundation for public policy. The right to be considered emphasizes the need for an inclusive, domination-free public sphere in which arguments are assessed on equal terms. Meanwhile, the right to be given an explanation underscores the political system’s responsibility to respond to public opinion communicatively rather than merely through formal procedures. The analysis concludes that public participation becomes substantively meaningful only when grounded in communicative rationality and protected from system colonization. Therefore, political legitimacy in modern democracy should not rest solely on procedural compliance but on rational dialogue formed between citizens and the state within a deliberative public sphere.
Co-Authors Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Zamroni Abdussamad