Andini, Mutiara Nefa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KASUS PENGAKUAN CHINA ATAS WILAYAH LAUT CHINA SELATAN MENURUT UNCLOS 1982 YANG MELIBATKAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN NASIONAL Andini, Mutiara Nefa; Ridev, Ghania Khalisa; Putri, Rachelya; Henandi, Aqilla Nada; Vesca H., Lusya Najwa; Andrean, Muhammad Fadhil; Putra, Dhaffa Hosya; Septaria, Ema
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v6i1.270

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis pengakuan Tiongkok atas wilayah Laut China Selatan dalam konteks hukum internasional dan hukum nasional, khususnya mengacu pada Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa tentang Hukum Laut 1982 (UNCLOS 1982). Metodologi yang digunakan meliputi analisis hukum, studi kasus, dan studi literatur, dengan fokus pada dokumen hukum utama seperti UNCLOS 1982 dan putusan Mahkamah Arbitrase dalam sengketa Filipina vs. Tiongkok. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Sengketa Laut Natuna antara Indonesia dan China, yang didorong oleh klaim sepihak China atas wilayah tersebut dalam "Nine Dash Line," Indonesia, sebagai negara yang telah meratifikasi UNCLOS melalui Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 1985. Dalam beberapa kasus, Filipina memilih untuk mengajukan gugatan ke Mahkamah Arbitrase Internasional (Permanent Court of Arbitration), yang menghasilkan putusan yang mendukung Filipina dan menolak klaim China berdasarkan "nine-dash line" sebagai tidak sah menurut UNCLOS. Sebaliknya, Indonesia tidak membawa sengketanya ke pengadilan internasional, melainkan lebih memilih penyelesaian damai melalui mediasi sambil tetap menolak klaim China secara sepihak. Negara-negara yang terlibat dalam sengketa maritim harus memperkuat kerangka hukum nasional mereka agar sejalan dengan kewajiban internasional, terutama dalam mematuhi ketentuan UNCLOS.
Victims as Subjects, Not Objects, in the Criminal Justice System Valencia, David; Andini, Mutiara Nefa; Aditya, Rifky; Utami, Ria Anggraeni
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20064032

Abstract

The criminal justice system has long tended to be offender-oriented, resulting in victims often being marginalized and viewed merely as objects within the evidentiary process. In reality, victims are the parties who directly suffer losses due to criminal acts and should, therefore, be positioned as subjects with legal rights and interests. This research aims to analyze the legal standing of victims within the criminal justice system and examine efforts to establish them as subjects from a victimological perspective. This study employs a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, which are analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that although victims are normatively recognized as having rights, in practice, they are still frequently treated as objects within the criminal justice system. This is caused by a strong offender-oriented paradigm, a legal culture that does not yet favor victims, and limited mechanisms for victim participation in the judicial process. Consequently, a paradigm shift through victimological approaches specifically critical and restorative victimology is required to strengthen the position of victims as subjects within the criminal justice system.