Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

9. ATRISI MILITER DALAM PERENCANAAN OPERASI MILITER ANALISIS KOMPREHENSIF MODEL MATEMATIKA UNTUK ATRISI PERSONEL DAN LOGISTIK Andri Gandhy; Ronny Samsul Bahri; Muchammad Furqon Muchaddats; Rakin Ghiyat; Kurniawan; Rayhan Kemal; Tia Dikatama Tsania
Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Vol 4 No 4 (2025): Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Triwulan Keempat
Publisher : Staf Komunikasi dan Elektronika, TNI Angkatan Udara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62828/jpb.v4i4.182

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan analisis komprehensif tentang modelmatematika atrisi militer dengan fokus pada atrisi personel dan logistik dalam konteksperencanaan operasi militer modern. Penelitian ini mengintegrasikan model teori klasikseperti persamaan Lanchester dengan sistem kontemporer seperti CALAPER (CampaignLevel Ammunition and Petroleum Expenditure Rates) untuk memberikan kerangka analitisyang holistik. Metodologi penelitian meliputi analisis literatur ekstensif, pengembangan modelmatematika terintegrasi, dan implementasi skenario operasional realistis untuk validasimodel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integrasi model atrisi personel dan logistikmemberikan prediksi yang lebih akurat terhadap efektivitas operasional dibandingkanpendekatan parsial. Model yang dikembangkan mampu memprediksi tingkat atrisi denganakurasi tinggi dan memberikan wawasan strategis untuk optimasi alokasi sumber daya.Implikasi praktis dari penelitian ini mencakup peningkatan akurasi perencanaan operasi,optimasi alokasi sumber daya, dan pengurangan risiko operasional melalui prediksi atrisiyang lebih baik.
1. DEGREE OF SUPERIORITY IN AIR OPERATIONS THEORETICAL ANALYSIS, DETERMINING FACTORS, AND STRATEGIC CASE STUDY Andri Gandhy; Suroso; Ronny; Samsul Bahri; Muchammad; Dikatama Tsania; Supriyanto Kemal; Kusuma Safarie
Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Triwulan Pertama
Publisher : Staf Komunikasi dan Elektronika, TNI Angkatan Udara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62828/jpb.v5i1.195

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the degree of air superiority, a strategic concept thatplays a central role in the planning and implementation of modern air operations. This termrefers to the degree of control of an air force over a specific area that allows the execution ofmissions without significant interference from opposing air forces. In general, the degree of airsuperiority is classified into three categories: air parity, air superiority, and air supremacy, eachof which indicates a different degree of dominance over potential enemy air threats. Airdominance is a strategic prerequisite that determines the outcome of modern conflicts. Theconcept of degree of superiority evolves along with changes in technology, doctrine, and thecomplexity of global geopolitics. In the context of air operations, achieving degree of airsuperiority is influenced by various factors, including technological capabilities, theeffectiveness of air defense systems, information mastery, and the efficiency of command,control, communications, computers, intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance (C4ISR)systems. The interaction of these factors contributes to the success of joint operations and theability to maintain long-term air dominance. Effective air superiority also directly impacts thefreedom of action of one's own forces in conducting cross-service operations. Acomprehensive understanding of the degree of air superiority is a key factor in strategicdecision-making at the operational level. Integration of technological capabilities, informationsuperiority, and cross-service coordination is necessary to achieve sustainable air dominance.Therefore, analyzing the degree of air superiority is not only crucial for tactical purposes butalso serves as the basis for developing comprehensive air defense doctrine and strategy. Thisarticle discusses the theoretical framework in depth, the factors influencing its achievement,and presents case studies from various conflicts ranging from World War II to potential conflictsin the Indo-Pacific. This study confirms that successfully achieving air superiority depends notonly on air power alone, but also on multi-domain integration, defense industry readiness, andpolitical and diplomatic support.