Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Leadership and Work Loyalty in Improving Work Assessment at the North Sumatra Provincial Cooperatives and SMEs Office UPT. PLUT Zebua, Evi Beatric Dewi; Rizky, M. Chaerul; Sapuri, Adinda Desi; Syahputra, Kurniawan; Nasution, Halimah Tusakdiyah
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNTING, GENERAL FINANCE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/marginal.v5i1.1980

Abstract

Employee performance assessment is a fundamental aspect in human resource management that determines the effectiveness of government organizations. North Sumatra Province Cooperatives and SMEs Office UPT. PLUT as an agency that plays a role in community economic empowerment faces challenges in optimizing employee performance. Effective leadership and high job loyalty are suspected to be determinant factors in improving employee work assessment. This paper seeks to identify the influence of leadership and occupational allegiance in augmenting performance evaluations within the UPT PLUT Office of Cooperatives and SMEs, North Sumatra Province, while simultaneously delineating the causal interplay among leadership, work loyalty, and employee performance metrics. The investigation adopts a quantitative methodological framework, encompassing the entire personnel population of 57 individuals at the UPT PLUT Office of Cooperatives and SMEs, North Sumatra Province. The sampling framework employed a census (saturated sampling) technique, ensuring comprehensive representativeness. The instrumentation apparatus consisted of a Likert-scaled questionnaire, meticulously constructed to gauge perceptual tendencies across relevant dimensions. Data processing and inferential analytics were executed through multiple regression modeling utilizing SPSS software version 29. Empirical revelations elucidate that leadership exerts a favorable and statistically consequential impact upon employee performance indices. Meanwhile, occupational fealty was substantiated to impart a constructive and substantively meaningful influence on performance outcomes. Collectively, leadership and professional dedication were observed to synergistically contribute a salient effect on employee efficacy, with an R² coefficient of 0.311 (31.1%), signifying that these two determinants collectively accounted for 72.3% of the observed variance in performance appraisals.
The Influence of Leadership Style, Motivation and Training on Non-ASN Job Satisfaction at the Medan Helvetia Sub-district Office Zebua, Evi Beatric Dewi; Wahyono, Teguh; Samrin, Samrin
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.612

Abstract

Non-ASN personnel have an important role in supporting public services at the sub-district level, but often face various challenges related to irregular employment status and limitations in career development. This study aims to analyze the influence of leadership style, motivation, and training on the job satisfaction of non-ASN personnel at the Medan Helvetia Sub-district Office, both partially and simultaneously. The research method used is quantitative research with an associative approach. The research population is all non-ASN personnel at the Medan Helvetia Sub-district Office which totals 144 people. The number of samples was determined using the Slovin formula with an error rate of 10% so that a sample of 59 respondents was obtained which was selected using the incidental sampling technique. Data collection is carried out through questionnaires that have been tested for validity and reliability. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regression analysis with the help of SPSS software.  The results of the study show that: (1) Leadership style has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction; (2) Motivation has a positive but insignificant effect on job satisfaction; (3) Training has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction; (4) Leadership style, motivation, and training simultaneously have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction. An R² value of 0.929 indicates that all three independent variables are able to explain 92.9% of the variation in job satisfaction, while the remaining 7.1% is explained by other variables outside the research model