Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Zaenul Mahmudi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Korban KDRT Perspektif Maqasid Syariah Jasser Auda: Analisis Terhadap UU No. 23 Tahun 2004 Qudsiyatut Diana; Zaenul Mahmudi; Khoirul Anam
Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): Maqasid Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/mqsd.v14i3.29019

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) merupakan masalah kompleks yang melibatkan aspek sosial, hukum, dan moral, sehingga membutuhkan penanganan menyeluruh berdasarkan nilai keadilan dan kemanusiaan. Masalah ini tidak hanya mengancam keutuhan keluarga, tetapi juga bertentangan dengan prinsip kemaslahatan yang menjadi fokus utama dalam hukum Islam. Dalam perspektif Maqasid Syariah, perlindungan terhadap korban KDRT memiliki landasan kuat, yaitu menjaga jiwa (hifz an-nafs), kehormatan (hifz al-'irdh), dan keturunan (hifz an-nasl) sebagai tujuan dasar syariat Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif melalui studi kepustakaan untuk mengkaji hubungan antara pemikiran Jasser Auda tentang Maqasid Syariah kontemporer dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya kesesuaian yang kuat antara nilai-nilai Maqasid Syariah dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum nasional dalam mewujudkan perlindungan yang adil, sesuai konteks, dan berorientasi pada kesejahteraan manusia. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penggabungan konsep antara pendekatan sistemik Jasser Auda dengan hukum positif Indonesia, yang menghasilkan model perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan yang fleksibel dan humanis. Secara konseptual, penelitian ini memperkuat arah pembaruan hukum Islam menuju konstruksi hukum yang inklusif, progresif, dan responsif terhadap isu-isu kemanusiaan modern.   Kata Kunci: Maqasid Syariah, Jasser Auda, Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, Perlindungan Perempuan, Hukum Islam.
Reformulation of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) Number 1 of 2023 Article 445 Paragraph (1) Item 1: A Lawrence Friedman’s Theory of Justice Perspective Toward a Responsive and Culture-Oriented Criminal Law Jumain Azizi; Roibin Roibin; Zaenul Mahmudi
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): December : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i4.819

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Article 445 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) Number 1 of 2023, which regulates the criminal act of eloping with a young woman. The provision is considered to be in tension with the social and cultural realities of Indonesian society, particularly the people of Lombok who practice the merariq tradition. Merariq is an ancestral customary practice within marriage rituals involving the consensual elopement of the prospective bride as an integral part of the marriage process. This research uses Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory, which examines three main components of law: (1) the substance of law—normative provisions contained in legislation; (2) the structure of law institutions and law enforcement agencies; and (3) the legal culture values, attitudes, and behavior of society toward law. This study is a normative legal research that treats law as norms, principles, doctrines, and rules. The primary legal material is Article 445 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code. The findings indicate that, from the perspective of legal substance, the article remains ambiguous. Its formulation potentially conflicts with Indonesia’s legal culture, which in practice prioritizes familial and traditional mechanisms for resolving private conflicts. Based on these findings, this study recommends a reformulation of the legal substance to make it more responsive to the socio-cultural context. The reformulation should be grounded in the principles of ultimum remedium and restorative justice, providing space for customary law and local culture as legitimate mechanisms to resolve private disputes. This approach is expected to reduce the disproportionate use of imprisonment and position criminal sanctions as a last resort in law enforcement.
Co-Authors Jumain Azizi Khoirul Anam Qudsiyatut Diana Roibin Roibin