Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Moh. Muhlisin
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kriminalisasi Deepfake Pornography Berbasis AI dalam Perspektif Perlindungan HAM Di Era Digital Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum; Moh. Muhlisin; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi November 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1246

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence technology in the digital era had a significant impact on human life, including emergence of abuse in the form of deepfake pornography.  Phenomenon involves the manipulation of a person's face or voice into pornographic content without consent, which clearly violates the rights to privacy, honor, and human dignity. In Indonesia, although there are regulations such as the ITE Law, the TPKS Law, the PDP Law, and the national Criminal Code, there is no regulation that explicitly ensnares the crime of deepfake pornography. This creates a legal vacuum and serious challenges in human rights protection. This study uses a normative juridical method with legislative and conceptual approach to analyze the urgency of criminalizing AI-based deepfake pornography and formulate an ideal policy model within the Indonesian criminal law system. The results of the study suggest that criminalization is a necessary form of human rights protection that can adapt to technological developments. The ideal criminalization policy model must be comprehensive and integrative, encompassing specific criminal regulations, strengthening digital forensics, victim protection and recovery, international cooperation, and a cultural approach. Criminal law can function effectively as an instrument for protecting human rights and promoting social justice in digital era.
Penerapan Hukum Kewenangan Audit Hukum Jaksa Pengacara Negara (JPN) Terkait Kesalahan Administrasi yang Berpotensi Merugikan Keuangan Negara Saka Andriyansa; Moh. Muhlisin; Dominikus Rato; Y.A.Triana Ohoiwutun
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publ
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1288

Abstract

Law enforcement in the context of recovering state finances does not solely focus on corruption offenses, but also on administrative errors that may potentially cause losses to the state. The State Attorney (Jaksa Pengacara Negara/JPN) holds strategic authority through legal audits to identify, assess, and provide recommendations regarding potential state financial losses arising from administrative actions inconsistent with applicable regulations. This research formulates two main issues: first, how the legal authority of JPN is applied in conducting legal audits on administrative errors potentially causing state financial losses; second, what legal mechanisms are employed by JPN in conducting legal audits on such administrative errors. The findings of this study indicate that the implementation of legal authority by JPN through legal audits aims to ensure that every aspect of authority, procedure, and substance in governmental decision-making, as well as in the procurement of goods and services, complies with legal provisions, starting from the needs identification stage up to the final handover of work results. This is essential for JPN to accurately determine administrative errors that may potentially cause state financial losses and to formulate them in a legal audit report. The mechanism for resolving legal audit findings is carried out through coordination between JPN and the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) to determine the amount of potential losses. Subsequently, JPN provides recommendations to the applicant to return the potential losses to the state or regional treasury.
Co-Authors Dominikus Rato I Gede Widhiana Suarda Saka Andriyansa Triana Ohoiwutun Y.A.Triana Ohoiwutun Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum