Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SIGn Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Sasana
Febiyanti, Nabilla
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dialektika Hubungan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positive Legislator dengan Pembentuk Undang-Undang dalam Proses Legislasi Muttaqin, Labib; Enggarani, Nuria Siswi; Nurhayati, Nunik; M. Juanidi; Febiyanti, Nabilla
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4486

Abstract

Studi ini menganalisis perluasan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dari negative legislator menjadi positive legislator yang berpotensi menimbulkan konflik dengan lembaga pembentuk undang-undang, yaitu DPR dan Presiden. Fokus kajian ini meliputi legitimasi MK dalam membuat putusan positive legislator, konflik yang muncul dengan pembentuk undang-undang akibat putusan tersebut, serta solusi untuk meredam konflik tersebut. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui literature review. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa putusan MK yang bersifat positive legislator, seperti Putusan No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Putusan No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024, dan Putusan No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024, telah memicu ketegangan dengan pembentuk undang-undang. Untuk mencegah konflik serupa, diperlukan kesepahaman antara MK, DPR, dan Presiden mengenai batas kewenangan MK dalam membuat putusan positive legislator serta mekanisme tindak lanjut putusan tersebut oleh pembentuk undang-undang. 
Constitutional Court vs. Lawmakers: Positive Legislature, Decision Implementation, and Balance of Authority Muttaqin, Labib; Enggarani, Nuria Siswi; Nurhayati, Nunik; Junaidi, M.; Febiyanti, Nabilla
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.554

Abstract

The Constitutional Court’s transition from a negative legislator to an executor of positive legislation has created structural tension with Lawmakers. This phenomenon creates legislative resistance that impedes decision implementation, often leaving constitutional compliance to rely on public pressure. This research aims to analyze the roots of such disharmony and to formulate a procedural law design capable of effectively guaranteeing the execution of decisions. Through a normative legal research method using the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, this study examines constitutional dynamics following the Constitutional Court’s delivery of two decisions regarding the judicial review of Law Number 10 of 2016 and Law Number 11 of 2020. The research results indicate that implementation barriers stem from the counter-majoritarian difficulty and the obsolescence of Chapter V of Law Number 24 of 2003, which fails to accommodate the complexity of positive legislature authority. As an absolute solution, this research recommends the urgent formation of a stand-alone Constitutional Court Procedure Bill (separate bill). This Bill must grant the Constitutional Court attribution authority to establish a “mandatory deadline” (tenggat waktu eksekutorial) for Lawmakers. Formalizing this mechanism is crucial to restoring the balance of the separation of powers system and ensuring the enforcement of constitutional supremacy through an institutionalized mechanism with legal certainty.
Co-Authors Junaidi, M. Labib Muttaqin M. Juanidi Nuria Siswi Enggarani