Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan sistem hukum common law dan civil law dalam konteks masyarakat majemuk Christianty, Eva Nurlaelisa; Hoesein, Zainal Arifin
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum (In progress)
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i4.1841

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis perbandingan sistem hukum common law dan civil law dalam mengakomodasi pluralitas masyarakat majemuk. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif komparatif dengan teknik analisis deskriptif-komparatif terhadap literatur hukum, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan putusan pengadilan dari negara representatif kedua sistem. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa common law memiliki fleksibilitas tinggi melalui doktrin stare decisis dan interpretasi yudisial kontekstual yang memungkinkan adaptasi cepat terhadap dinamika sosial, namun menghadapi tantangan kepastian hukum. Sebaliknya, civil law menawarkan kepastian melalui kodifikasi sistematis namun kurang responsif terhadap keragaman nilai lokal. Dalam konteks Indonesia sebagai negara civil law dengan masyarakat majemuk, diperlukan konvergensi antara kepastian kodifikasi dan fleksibilitas yudisial untuk mewujudkan sistem hukum yang responsif terhadap pluralitas tanpa mengorbankan kepastian hukum. Penelitian merekomendasikan adopsi prinsip interpretasi kontekstual dan pengakuan pluralisme hukum dalam kerangka kodifikasi nasional.
Rehabilitasi Hak Asasi dan Komunitas Korban: Pendekatan Victimologis terhadap Keadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Christianty, Eva Nurlaelisa; Nasution, Izhar Zahri; Susanto, Robertus Hadi; Fernando, Agung; Santiago, Faisal
JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana
Publisher : POKJANAS Bekerja Sama Biro Perencanaan dan Penganggaran, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Agama RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61860/jigp.v4i3.344

Abstract

This article proposes a new conceptual paradigm for understanding justice for crime victims by emphasizing two fundamental dimensions of human existence: agency and communion. The background of the problem indicates that despite normative progress, traditional justice approaches—retributive, restorative, and procedural—have yet to fully address the victim's need to simultaneously restore these two existential dimensions, creating a gap between the ideal of holistic justice and the fragmented reality of practice. This study aims to address the specific problem of formulating a justice framework that integrates the restoration of the victim's agency (sense of control and autonomy) and communion (social connectedness). The methodology employed is qualitative with a theoretical-conceptual research design, utilizing an in-depth literature review of social psychology theories, victimology, and legal philosophy. Data analysis techniques include content analysis and conceptual synthesis to construct an integrative model. The study results in a "Rehabilitative Justice" framework that integrates elements of traditional paradigms to simultaneously restore victims' agency and communion. The discussion reveals that this approach provides a theoretical foundation for reforming the Indonesian criminal justice system to be more humanistic and victim-centered. In conclusion, justice for victims must be understood as an existential rehabilitation process that restores dignity and social bonds. Recommendations include a philosophical reorientation of criminal law, a procedural reconstruction towards meaningful participation, and an institutional transformation of victim protection agencies towards comprehensive psychosocial and existential support.