Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Annual Review of Legal Studies Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal
Dede Indraswara
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Metodologis Hukum: Diversifikasi dan Integrasi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Doktrinal), Empiris (Non-Doktrinal), dan Studi Sosio-Legal: Legal Methodological Reconstruction: Diversification and Integration of Normative (Doctrinal), Empirical (Non-Doctrinal), and Socio-Legal Research Dede Indraswara
IPMHI Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): June - December (Law in Transition: Contemporary Legal Challenges in a Changing
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v5i2.41599

Abstract

Ilmu hukum kontemporer kini tengah berhadapan dengan "kecemasan epistemologis," sebuah situasi di mana dikotomi kaku antara kubu normatif (doktrinal) dan empiris tidak lagi memadai untuk membedah kompleksitas tantangan global. Artikel ini bertujuan mengurai kebuntuan tersebut dengan mendekonstruksi sekat-sekat biner usang dan menawarkan kerangka metodologis yang lebih integratif. Melalui penelusuran literatur konseptual, studi ini merekonstruksi taksonomi penelitian hukum ke dalam tiga varian distingtif dengan fungsi yang saling melengkapi: (1) Penelitian doktrinal yang menjaga koherensi logika internal sistem hukum; (2) Penelitian empiris yang memverifikasi realitas faktual melalui instrumen kuantitatif; dan (3) Studi sosio-legal yang menyelami makna intersubjektif serta relasi kuasa melalui pendekatan kualitatif mendalam. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa validitas penelitian tidak ditentukan oleh fanatisme terhadap satu mazhab, melainkan oleh ketepatan metode dalam menjawab pertanyaan penelitian yang menegaskan prinsip bahwa metodologi harus tunduk pada substansi. Sebagai simpulan, masa depan kesarjanaan hukum menuntut adanya "bilingualisme intelektual": kemampuan peneliti untuk fasih menjembatani teks normatif dan realitas sosial demi melahirkan kebijakan hukum yang berbasis bukti (evidence-based policy).
The Legal Politics of Regulating Special Terrorism Crimes under Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code: Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Khusus dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Dede Indraswara; Cahya Wulandari; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Aisyah Nur Rafidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.3480

Abstract

Legal politics in the context of criminal law must be analyzed seriously, both in relation to material criminal law and formal criminal law. Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism Crimes and Law No. 9 of 2013 concerning Terrorism Financing Crimes underwent changes after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (Indonesian Criminal Code). This amendment includes a bridge article relating to criminal acts of terrorism within the Criminal Code, which thus has implications for the elaboration of general and special rules. The purpose of this research is to find out how to use logical (Logische Specialiteit) or systematic (Systematische Specialiteit) specialties in interpreting this matter. The method used is juridical-normative with an analytical and conceptual approach based on various legal literature. This research obtained 2 (two) results, namely an explanation of the rules against terrorism in Indonesian positive law and an explanation of the bridging article in the reform of the Indonesian Criminal Code with logical specificity. So it is concluded that the regulation of special terrorism regulations in the Criminal Code does not mean that it weakens the Special Law, but instead strengthens these special regulations in the future if there is a criminal act of terrorism.
The Legal–Security Paradox of Green Extractivism: A Green Criminology Inquiry into Corporate Roles and Counterterrorism Implications in Indonesia: Paradoks Hukum-Keamanan dalam Ekstraktivisme Hijau: Kajian Kriminologi Hijau mengenai Peran Korporasi dan Implikasinya terhadap Pemberantasan Terorisme di Indonesia Venessa Huwae; Sudrajat Tedi; Tri Lisiani Prihatinah; Duhita Pandya; Dede Indraswara
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v5i1.48210

Abstract

This article critically examines the structural incapacity of Indonesian law to anticipate and regulate the transformation of natural resource exploitation into vectors of national security risk. Operating within the normative-doctrinal tradition, the study adopts statute, conceptual, and case-based legal approaches to interrogate the triadic relationship between corporate actors, ecological destruction, and political violence. The central argument advanced is that Indonesian law sustains a paradox: it simultaneously authorises resource extraction as a developmental imperative while failing to acknowledge that extractivism generates structural grievances which may radicalise affected communities, thereby constituting a pre-terrorism environment. Green criminology serves as the analytical framework, augmented by ecological justice theory, Rawlsian distributive philosophy, and Critical Legal Studies. Doctrinal analysis reveals that the Mineral and Coal Mining Law (UU Minerba), the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH), and the Anti-Terrorism Law (UU Terorisme) operate in regulatory silos, producing normative gaps through which corporations escape accountability for harms that transcend environmental categories and enter the domain of human-ecological security threats. Case analysis of PT. Kallista Alam, PT. Adei Plantation, and related litigation demonstrates that courts have yet to articulate a jurisprudential framework linking corporate environmental crime to security consequences. This article concludes by proposing a 'Green Security Law Framework' an integrated normative architecture reconciling environmental, security, and counterterrorism law as the prescriptive response to a legal deficit that renders the Indonesian state structurally complicit in its own security vulnerabilities.
Formulation of Criminal Liability of Corporations Perpetrating Criminal Acts of Terrorism in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code: Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dede Indraswara
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. S1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol1i4.10213

Abstract

Corporations as subjects of criminal law can be held criminally responsible for corporations as perpetrators of terrorism. In Indonesia, the regulation of Terrorism outside the Criminal Code recognizes that corporate subjects are only those with legal entities and those without legal entities, without knowing the types and application of appropriate criminal penalties. The ratification of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (Indonesian Criminal Code) provides a complement to the criminal liability of corporations that commit acts of terrorism (terrorist corporations) which regulates the type of legal entity, ownership status and legal entity status. In addition, for corporations that have been subject to criminal sanctions, there is still a gap in corporate criminal liability related to the spread of radical corporate teachings. This shows that there is a legal gap between das sein and das sollen related to the type of legal entity, ownership status, legal entity status that has not been regulated in the Terrorism Law, the Terrorism Financing Law and criminal liability for radical corporate teachings in the Indonesian Criminal Code. Research shows that the ideal corporate criminal liability is to form a variety of corporate qualifications so that they are relevant to current needs. In addition, terrorist corporations that have been declared banned often still have significant influence and transform into new entities, so granting legal status that prohibits radical teachings from developing and being disseminated can be a form of accountability for terrorist corporations that embodies a sense of justice.
Co-Authors Aisyah Nur Rafidah Cahya Wulandari Duhita Pandya Muhammad Azil Maskur Sudrajat Tedi Tri Lisiani Prihatinah Venessa Huwae