Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

Mengenal Batik Kapal Kandas sebagai Kaderisasi Nilai Konservasi Budaya Eta Yuni Lestari; Slamet Sumarto; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Puji Lestari
Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Maret 2023 - Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25008/altifani.v3i2.385

Abstract

Pemberdayaan kelompok Karangtaruna di Desa Lau Kudus dengan pelatihan membatik bisa dijadikan sebagai kegiatan untuk mendukung pelaksanaan pendidikan karakter konservasi sosial budaya. Masih adanya permasalahan seperti minimnya pengetahuan masyarakat khususnya generasi muda terhadap budaya bangsa perlu dijadikan perhatian. Di Kabupaten Kudus terdapat salah satu motif batik yaitu motif Kapal Kandas, sayangnya motif ini termasuk batik yang hampir punah. Tujuan dari kegiatan ini adalah memberikan pengetahuan tentang motif batik kapal kandas kepada karangtaruna yang merupakan mitra pengabdian sebagai upaya melestarikan budaya lokal Kudus. Metode pelaksanaan kegiatan dilaksanakan melui kegiatan sosialisasi yang dilaksanakan melalui zoom meeting. Hasil kegiatan yang telah dilaksanakan yaitu upaya kaderisasi nilai-nilai konservasi budaya lokal dapat dilakukan dengan memberikan pengetahuan tentang makna, nilai dan filosofi dari motif batik Kapal Kandas, untuk meningkatkan keterampilan membatik dapat dilakukan dengan melaksanakan kegiatan pelatihan membatik motif batik kapal Kandas, akan tetapi karena pandemic covid 19 kegiatan dialihkan dengan penayangan video membatik motif kapal Kandas. Serta menawarkan disain-disain pemanfaatan kain motif kapal kandas untuk dijadikan produk yang bernilai ekonomi seperti Kaos, Tote bag, masker, dan mug dengan motif Kapal Kandas. Diharapkan akan semakin banyak generasi muda yang mencintai batik sehingga dapat menjaga, melestarikan, mengamankan budaya lokal ditengah arus globalisasi yang tidak bisa kita hindari.
Regulatory Strategies for Accelerating Civil Servant Functional Promotions in Higher Education Endang Retno Pujirahayu; Siti Mursidah; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Ricky Dermawan Fauzi
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v11i1.11830

Abstract

This study examines a model for accelerating promotions to functional positions following the issuance of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (PAN RB) Regulation Number 1 of 2023 within the Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES) environment. The research employs a normative legal method by analyzing existing legal and policy documents, combined with a qualitative approach to produce descriptive findings and draw conclusions from the research questions. The study addresses two main issues: (1) the key provisions in PAN RB Regulation Number 1 of 2023 that enable accelerated promotion for functional officials (Jabatan Fungsional, JF), and (2) the strategies that JF employees can adopt to optimize promotion opportunities under this regulation. Based on analysis and implementation at UNNES, the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology Decree No. 209/P/2024 has demonstrated significant progress in streamlining the promotion process for civil servant lecturers. Procedural simplification and a stronger emphasis on objective performance evaluation have positively influenced civil-service career development, particularly for academic staff. The integration of credit-score systems and digital platforms such as SISTER enhances administrative efficiency and promotes transparency in performance assessment. Overall, this research contributes to cross-sector discussions on human resource management, especially regarding performance-based appraisal, policy transparency, technology integration, and the broader impact of regulatory reforms on employee career advancement and well-being.
The Legal Politics of Regulating Special Terrorism Crimes under Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code: Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Khusus dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Dede Indraswara; Cahya Wulandari; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Aisyah Nur Rafidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.3480

Abstract

Legal politics in the context of criminal law must be analyzed seriously, both in relation to material criminal law and formal criminal law. Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism Crimes and Law No. 9 of 2013 concerning Terrorism Financing Crimes underwent changes after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (Indonesian Criminal Code). This amendment includes a bridge article relating to criminal acts of terrorism within the Criminal Code, which thus has implications for the elaboration of general and special rules. The purpose of this research is to find out how to use logical (Logische Specialiteit) or systematic (Systematische Specialiteit) specialties in interpreting this matter. The method used is juridical-normative with an analytical and conceptual approach based on various legal literature. This research obtained 2 (two) results, namely an explanation of the rules against terrorism in Indonesian positive law and an explanation of the bridging article in the reform of the Indonesian Criminal Code with logical specificity. So it is concluded that the regulation of special terrorism regulations in the Criminal Code does not mean that it weakens the Special Law, but instead strengthens these special regulations in the future if there is a criminal act of terrorism.
Juridical Analysis of the Double Track System in Countering Terrorism Acts In Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Double Track System Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia Kukuh Satria Wiratama; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Shofriya Qanitatin Abidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.26407

Abstract

Terrorism has become a serious concern crime in Indonesia, where the methods of countering it through law enforcement are currently faced with a number of challenges. Countering terrorism is faced with the situation of rapid development of modern terrorism and the contradiction between the need to handle terrorism as holistically as possible with existing regulations and a shift in the paradigm of modern law. This study aims to analyze the regulation of terrorism crimes in Indonesia from the perspective of a double track system in imposing sanctions. This research is also intended to identify and elaborate on the need to reform the penal policy to counter terrorism through the application of a pattern of imposing sanctions with a double track system for terrorism act. The method used in this study is doctrinal legal reasearch using a statutory approach and conseptual approach. The results obtained through this research are that the double track system has not been used and is firmly stated as a pattern for imposing sanctions for terrorism crimes in Indonesia. Furthermore, the double track system in imposing sanctions for terrorism crimes can be an idea for reforming penal policies in effective and holistic countermeasures of terrorism. The implementation of the double track system is based on the need for the law to respond to the development of terrorism, increase the effectiveness of the Terrorism Law, and adjust the paradigm of modern law.
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan oleh Jaksa: Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Semarang Vahra Devanie Ridwan Putri Putri; Muhammad Azil Maskur
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 3 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v5i3.3300

Abstract

Sebagai negara hukum, Indonesia menempatkan eksekusi putusan pengadilan sebagai bagian penting dalam menjamin kepastian dan keadilan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan pidana oleh jaksa di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Semarang, serta mengidentifikasi kendala dan strategi penyelesaiannya. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus, teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas pelaksanaan eksekusi dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, antara lain sikap terpidana yang tidak kooperatif, terutama ketika belum dilakukan penahanan, kekeliruan teknis dalam petikan putusan, serta penyimpanan barang bukti di luar Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara (Rupbasan) yang mengurangi transparansi. Untuk mengatasi hambatan tersebut, jaksa menerbitkan surat pemanggilan resmi, melakukan koordinasi dengan kepolisian, serta melakukan klarifikasi administratif kepada pengadilan. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya koordinasi antarlembaga, akurasi administrasi yustisial, dan pembaruan regulasi dalam meningkatkan efektivitas eksekusi putusan pengadilan.
Legal Protection for Abusers as Self-Victimizing Victims in Countermeasures to Narcotics Crimes Vera Desti Puspitasari; Muhammad Azil Maskur
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v12i1.41727

Abstract

Narcotics abuse is a social and legal problem that has various serious impacts in Indonesia. Not only individuals who consume them impact, but also have a wide impact on the people around them and the country's legal system. Therefore, the handling of narcotics abusers must be carried out comprehensively. Narcotics abusers are often positioned as mere perpetrators of crimes, even though they are also victims of psychological and physical dependence. The case described above creates a special concept known as self-victimizing victims, who are individuals who are victims of their own criminal acts. In Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, there are regulations regarding criminal penalties for narcotics abusers, however law enforcement is still predominantly repressive. This article aims to knowing and understanding the concept of self-victimizing victims in drug abusers as an effort to overcome narcotics crimes, and to describe and provide policy recommendations regarding legal protection for narcotics abusers as self-victimizing victims in order to improve the prevention of narcotics crimes that are more humane and proportional. Therefore, the problem formulation emerged: 1.) How is the concept of self-victimizing victims in narcotics abusers as countermeasures to narcotics crimes? And, 2.) How is the policy recommendations legal protection for narcotics abusers as self-victimizing victims to overcome narcotics crimes?. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a qualitatively approach. In this study, it was found that legal protection for drug abusers as self-victimizing victims requires policy reform through a double track system approach, repressive and rehabilitative punishment.
Transformation of the Public Prosecution Service as the Supervisory Authority for Community Service Orders Under the National Criminal Code Sasqia Putri Ramadhani; Muhammad Azil Maskur
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 11 No. 4 (2025): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v11i4.42611

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 (National Criminal Code/KUHP), replacing the colonial-era Criminal Code, marks a significant transformation for the Prosecutor’s Office. The institution must now shift from only executing imprisonment sentences to actively supervising community service punishments in public spaces. The prosecutor’s authority to execute court decisions is reaffirmed in recent regulations, including Article 349 paragraph (2) of Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Nevertheless, the lack of comprehensive technical guidelines for the supervisory mechanism continues to pose ongoing challenges. This issue was examined through normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches to assess the regulatory framework and the prosecutor’s role in executing final and binding (inkracht) court decisions. While a Prosecutor General’s Guideline exists, supervision regulations are broad and lack a specific mechanism for enforcing community service orders. The current system combines community service supervision with conditional punishment and probation, yet still treats community service as a separate category, despite its weaker implementation. The lack of supervision outside working hours increases the risk that offenders may avoid oversight, making the system overly dependent on their good faith. 
Changes in Minimum Criminal Sanctions for Corruption Offenses in the National Criminal Code Based on the Perspective of the Purpose of Punishment Imelia Damai Agusthin; Muhammad Azil Maskur
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 11 No. 4 (2025): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v11i4.42675

Abstract

The National Criminal Code brings about a paradigm shift in punishment from retributive justice to restorative justice, which emphasizes recovery. Through the process of recodification of criminal law, a number of provisions on corruption in the Anti-Corruption Law were revoked and re-regulated in the National Criminal Code. However, the new regulations have sparked debate due to changes in the minimum prison sentence. There are concerns that this change will weaken the severity of criminal punishment for corruption, which has been understood as a crime that harms the public interest. Based on this background, this paper examines the factors behind the changes to the minimum criminal sanctions for corruption in the National Criminal Code and analyzes these changes from the perspective of the objectives of criminal punishment in Indonesia. This study uses the normative legal research method (doctrinal research) with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the discussion show that the changes in minimum criminal sanctions were driven by a number of factors, including philosophical, sociological, and juridical factors. The objectives of punishment in the National Criminal Code are aimed at protecting the community and rehabilitating perpetrators, the changes to the minimum penalties for corruption, although designed to create balance, tend to shift the focus towards rehabilitation, thereby risking weakening the protection of society if not accompanied by the recovery of state losses, the application of additional sanctions, consistency in verdicts, and improvements to the rehabilitation system, which still faces structural and cultural problems.
The Role of Visum et Repertum as Evidence in Proving Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence Against Children: A Study of Decision Number 652/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Btm Dinda Christy Nada; Muhammad Azil Maskur
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i1.44896

Abstract

In the Indonesian criminal justice system, Visum et Repertum occupies a strategic position, especially in situations where children become victims of sexual violence, as it serves as evidence that provides medical and scientific support for proving the elements of a crime. This study aims to analyze the role of Visum et Repertum in proving criminal acts of sexual violence against children and its position as material for judges' consideration in deciding cases, with a focus on Decision Number 652/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Btm. The research uses a normative legal method, combining a regulatory approach and case studies, which are then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show that based on Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, under Article 184 paragraph (1) in relation to Article 187 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Visum et Repertum constitutes documentary evidence within the criminal justice system. However, its probative force is not autonomous, as it must be considered alongside other admissible evidence and the judge’s conviction in accordance with Article 183. Accordingly, Visum et Repertum serves as a crucial instrument in supplying objective medical findings, particularly in cases concerning sexual abuse of children. With the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, the evidence system has undergone improvements that further emphasize the position of documentary evidence in the criminal justice process. Thus, the Visum et Repertum serves not only as a medical document but also as a legal instrument supporting the realization of material truth and the principle of assisting the judge in forming an objective and measurable legal conviction.