Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Using Mentimeter in Action Research to Enhance Students' Engagement in Online Learning Ima Chusnul Chotimah; Dian Anik Cahyani; Maskurin Fajarina; Abdullah Farih
JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): JEELL Volume 12 Number 2 June 2025
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32682/jeell.v12i2.69

Abstract

In online learning, improving student participation in EFL classes is still a growing concern. Fortunately, several studies have demonstrated a favorable relationship between using technology to increase student engagement. This action research study investigated the effect of using a mentimeter on the student’s engagement in online learning. The study used a classroom cyclic action-research approach to enhance student engagement over a month. The participants were 22 second-year-undergraduate students from the local university in Indonesia, consisting of 7 males and 15 females. Findings revealed that engaging students in engaged discussion enhances their engagement and achievement in the word cloud and open-ended questions model using a mentimeter. The students gave positive responses after being taught by using a mentimeter. The findings support the enhancement of the students’ engagement in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning context and suggest useful implications for educators.
Developing a LOTS and HOTS-Based Reading Comprehension Instrument for Lower Secondary Students Ima Chusnul Chotimah; Utami Widiati; Nunung Suryati; Mirjam Anugerahwati
Journal of Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): July
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/jes.v4i2.3066

Abstract

To assess students’ reading comprehension, both low-level and high-level thinking tests are needed. However, the majority of lower secondary school test emphasize memorization of facts rather than offering enough information about critical thinking. This study offers a novel approach by developing a balanced reading comprehension test integrating both lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) within Barrett’s Taxonomy framework. The instrument was designed with an equal proportion LOTS and HOTS items. Employing Mardapi’s Research and Development (R&D) model, the instrument was administered to 39 lower secondary students through pre- and post-test trials. The result of item analysis revealed validity for both pre-test and post-test instruments, with 27 of 30 items retained and 3 items excluded for invalidity. Reliability levels were very high (? = 0.888 for the pre-test and ? = 0.867 for the post-test). Item difficulty analysis showed that, in the pre-test, 43.33% of items were moderate, 30% difficult, and 26.67% easy; while in the post-test, 46.67% were moderate, 43.33% difficult, and 10% easy. Item discrimination analysis indicated that 56.67% of pre-test items were excellent, 26.67% were good, 6.67% mediocre, and 10% poor; whereas in the post-test, 66.67% were excellent, 13.33% good, 6.67% mediocre, and 13.33% poor. These results show the instrument’s robus psychometric qualities and its effectiveness in differentiating students’ comprehension. Theoretically, this study contributes a validated model for integrating Barrett’s taxonomy with balanced LOTS–HOTS assessment, while practically offering teachers and researchers a tool for aligning reading assessment with students’ cognitive skill development in EFL contexts.