Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

LEGAL REVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL CASE OF IDENTITY FALSEMENT IN PASSPORT ISSUANCE ( Study Case Decision Palangkaraya District Court Number 402/ Pid.Sus /2020/PN Plk ) Krisna Wati; Aristoteles; Evi; Claudia Yuni Pramita
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20682492

Abstract

Study This study accountability criminal to perpetrator main and related parties​​ participate as well as in action criminal forgery identity For get Document Journey Republic of Indonesia. The research also examines the role and authority of Immigration PPNS in enforcement law to action criminal immigration of a legal nature inclusion . Research use method juridical normative with approach legislation and studies case to Decision Number 402/ Pid.Sus /2020/PN Plk . Research results show that perpetrator main sentenced criminal based on Article 126 letter c of the Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration , but other parties are also involved in case This No ensnared criminal Because No made into subject law in investigation , although fact trial show existence parties involved​ and related assistance​​ direct with actions criminal . This is cause problem implementation principle accountability criminal liability and inclusion ( deelneming ) which are not optimal in law immigration . Research This confirm importance implementation principle justice substantive with ensnare all over parties involved​ as well as in action criminal , as well as strengthen the role of Immigration PPNS so that it can uphold law in a way comprehensive and proportional .
IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 2 OF 2015 JUNCTO SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 4 OF 2019 CONCERNING PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUITS REGARDING THE TIME LIMIT FOR SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUITS IN THE PALANGKA RAYA DISTRICT COURT Muhammad Dafi Nugraha; Yacob Ferdinan Martono; Evi; Louise Theresia
International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Cultural and Social Science
Publisher : Pena Cendekia Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1366

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of the deadline for resolving simple lawsuits based on Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2015 juncto Perma No. 4 of 2019 concerning the Procedure for Resolving Simple Lawsuits at the Palangka Raya District Court and to identify the factors causing the deadline to be exceeded. This research adopts an empirical legal method with a descriptive qualitative approach thru interviews and case data analysis using the Case Tracking Information System (SIPP). The research results show that the majority of simple lawsuits are not resolved within the 25 working days timeframe, with some cases even lasting up to 618 days. The delays are caused by the absence of the parties, the low level of legal understanding in society, the lack of good faith from the defendant, administrative obstacles, and the absence of sanctions for exceeding the deadline. This condition indicates a gap between norms and practices, so the goal of a simple lawsuit as a mechanism for quick, simple, and low-cost dispute resolution has not yet been fully realized.