Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

LEGAL REVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL CASE OF IDENTITY FALSEMENT IN PASSPORT ISSUANCE ( Study Case Decision Palangkaraya District Court Number 402/ Pid.Sus /2020/PN Plk ) Krisna Wati; Aristoteles; Evi; Claudia Yuni Pramita
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20682492

Abstract

Study This study accountability criminal to perpetrator main and related parties​​ participate as well as in action criminal forgery identity For get Document Journey Republic of Indonesia. The research also examines the role and authority of Immigration PPNS in enforcement law to action criminal immigration of a legal nature inclusion . Research use method juridical normative with approach legislation and studies case to Decision Number 402/ Pid.Sus /2020/PN Plk . Research results show that perpetrator main sentenced criminal based on Article 126 letter c of the Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration , but other parties are also involved in case This No ensnared criminal Because No made into subject law in investigation , although fact trial show existence parties involved​ and related assistance​​ direct with actions criminal . This is cause problem implementation principle accountability criminal liability and inclusion ( deelneming ) which are not optimal in law immigration . Research This confirm importance implementation principle justice substantive with ensnare all over parties involved​ as well as in action criminal , as well as strengthen the role of Immigration PPNS so that it can uphold law in a way comprehensive and proportional .
PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES OF THE CENTRAL KALIMANTAN REGIONAL POLICE AGAINST NARCOTICS DISTRIBUTION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW NO. 35 OF 2009 ON NARCOTICS Jenika; Aristoteles; Andika Wijaya
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20288759

Abstract

The abuse and distribution of narcotics among university students remains a growing concern, particularly in Central Kalimantan. This study aims to analyze the Upayaes and approaches implemented by the Central Kalimantan Regional Police (POLDA Kalteng) in preventing drug circulation within academic environments, especially in reference to the enforcement of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. Utilizing a juridical-empirical method, data were collected through interviews, field observations, and literature studies. The findings reveal that the police have initiated several preventive measures including public campaigns, educational outreach, utilization of social media platforms, and formal collaborations with universities through the formation of Anti-Narcotics Task Forces. However, these initiatives, especially those focused directly on students, remain inconsistent and often event-based. Legal enforcement has been applied equally, with no exemption for students, while still allowing for rehabilitation alternatives for non-distributing users. The main challenges faced include limited funding, low student participation, weak family reporting, and inadequate intersectoral coordination. This study recommends enhancing structured and continuous drug prevention programs on campus, strengthening institutional support from universities and student organizations, and increasing family involvement in early detection and intervention. The outcomes of this research are expected to support the development of more effective anti-narcotics policies within higher education institutions and to promote a more vigilant and resilient campus culture against drug abuse.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR ILLEGAL TRADE IN PROTECTED WILDLIFE (KASONGAN PN DECISION NUMBER 48/PID.B/LH/2019/PN KSN) Ifa Lorenza; Aristoteles; Hilyatul Asfia; Kiki Kristanto
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19080563

Abstract

The illegal trade in protected wildlife constitutes a form of environmental crime that poses serious threats to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem balance. Indonesia, as a country with one of the highest levels of biodiversity in the world, faces significant challenges in enforcing the law against persistent wildlife trafficking practices. This study aims to analyze the legal framework and the application of criminal liability for perpetrators of illegal trade in protected wildlife, as reflected in the Decision of the Kasongan District Court Number 48/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN Ksn. The research employs a normative legal method using a statutory approach and a case approach. The findings indicate that the regulation of protected wildlife trade in Indonesia has been comprehensively established through Law Number 5 of 1990, reinforced by Law Number 32 of 2024, with Government Regulation Number 7 of 1999 serving as its implementing regulation. The analysis further shows that criminal liability is imposed on the offender on an individual basis, based on the fulfillment of criminal elements in the form of intentional trading of protected wildlife without the required authorization. However, the sentence imposed in the case is relatively lenient when compared to the maximum penalties specified by law. This situation reflects a gap between normative legal provisions and sentencing practices, which may undermine the effectiveness of law enforcement and the achievement of sustainable wildlife protection objectives.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATIONS IN DECISION NUMBER 98/PID.B/2025/PN TML CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL ACT OF DESTRUCTION OF GOODS Marisa Hawini; Aristoteles; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang; Putri Fransiska Purnama Pratiwi
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines judicial reasoning in the decision of the Tamiang Layang District Court Number 98/PID.B/2025/PN Tml concerning the criminal offense of property damage. The focus centers on two issues: first, whether judicial considerations comply with Article 406(1) of the old Penal Code and Article 521 of the new Penal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023); and second, whether the sentence reflects the principle of ultimum remedy as well as restorative justice. Adopting a normative juridical approach, the research reveals that while the elements of the offense were completely satisfied, there are weaknesses in the court's treatment of the statute of limitations and proportionality. Under the new Penal Code, Article 521 broadens criminal sanctions while opening wider space for restorative resolution. The conditional sentence imposed reflects a moderate application of ultimum remedy and restorative values, although the more appropriate civil law remedy was never pursued.