Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Justice Collaborator dalam Pengungkapan Jaringan Suap Ratna Tresnawati; Rahmat Bakri; Kamal; Suardi Dg. Mallawa; Syachdin
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/3q0why40

Abstract

Bribery as a form of organized corruption poses serious evidentiary challenges given its covert nature and the involvement of influential actors within circles of power. This study analyzes the legal standing of justice collaborators in bribery disclosure and evaluates the application of justice principles in their legal protection in Indonesia. It employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, analyzing legal materials qualitatively through deductive reasoning and comparison across judicial decisions. The findings reveal that although collaborator status is normatively recognized, its application remains inconsistent due to the absence of standardized eligibility criteria. Across six bribery cases, no collaborator received a sentence lighter than the prosecution's demand. Tommy Sumardi, Abdul Khoir, and Maliki were sentenced more heavily than demanded, the latter two after panels annulled the status granted by the Corruption Eradication Commission, while Andi Narogong's sentence rose from eight years at first instance to thirteen at cassation. This study recommends standardizing eligibility criteria through binding regulation, strengthening the binding force of witness protection agency recommendations, and codifying the collaborator's position within criminal procedural law.
The Effectiveness of the Deradicalization Program in Preventing Terrorism in Indonesia: Challenges of Reintegration and Its Implications for National Security Kamal; Andi Purnawati; Mukhlis Lubis
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.7397

Abstract

In recent years, deradicalization programs have gained increasing importance in Indonesia's efforts to combat terrorism and ensure national security. However, despite their implementation, the effectiveness of these programs, particularly in terms of social reintegration, remains a key challenge. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Indonesia’s deradicalization program, focusing on both ideological change and social reintegration of former extremists. Using a qualitative approach, the research conducted in-depth interviews, participant observations, and document analysis involving former terrorists, BNPT officials, and religious leaders. The findings reveal that while ideological shifts were successfully achieved through religious and psychosocial approaches, challenges in social reintegration, such as societal stigma and lack of family support, continue to hinder long-term success. The research underscores the importance of a more comprehensive approach to deradicalization, emphasizing social reintegration strategies to ensure sustained national security. The study offers practical recommendations for policymakers to strengthen post-program support, including anti-stigma campaigns and community-based reintegration initiatives. These findings contribute to the broader discourse on counterterrorism and deradicalization strategies in Indonesia
Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Terlibat Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Tengah: The Implementation of Diversion for Minors Involved in Drug-Related Crimes at the Central Sulawesi Regional Police Department Ratna Dianti; Kamal; Hasnawati
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Media Hukum (JMH)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tompotika Luwuk Banggai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59414/jmh.v14i2.1373

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan diversi terhadap anak yang terlibat tindak pidana narkotika di Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Tengah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan diversi di Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Tengah telah dilakukan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, khususnya Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Namun, dalam praktiknya masih ditemukan kendala, seperti keterbatasan pemahaman aparat penegak hukum, kurangnya partisipasi dari pihak korban dan keluarga, serta stigma masyarakat terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana narkotika. Selain itu, tidak semua kasus narkotika dapat dilakukan diversi, terutama yang melibatkan jumlah barang bukti yang besar atau peran anak sebagai pengedar. Kesimpulannya, penerapan diversi terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana narkotika di Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Tengah telah berjalan, namun belum secara optimal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, sosialisasi kepada masyarakat, serta penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga guna mendukung efektivitas pelaksanaan diversi demi tercapainya keadilan restoratif dan perlindungan anak.