Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

LIVING IN THE SHADOW OF THE PLAN: A SOCIO-LEGAL STUDY OF THE AKIT INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY IN JANGKANG VILLAGE Tuah Kalti Takwa; Kingkel Panah Grossman; Arif Wicaksa; Siti Mawaddah Palamani; Sri Agustina Ratnawati; Ahmad Fuadi
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i6.4530

Abstract

The Indonesian government established the 2021–2025 National Action Plan for Human Rights (RANHAM) as a commitment to protect the rights of vulnerable groups, including indigenous communities. However, a significant gap often exists between national policies and the realities faced by these communities on the ground. This study investigates the implementation of RANHAM for the Akit indigenous people inANGKAng Village, Bengkalis, who face significant socio-economic and cultural vulnerabilities. Using an empirical legal research method with a socio-legal approach, this study collected primary data through in-depth interviews with village officials, community leaders, and members of the Akit community. The findings reveal a stark reality: the RANHAM policy has not been socialized at the local level. Government officials and the Akit community themselves are largely unaware of the plan's existence, resulting in a complete failure of implementation. As a result, the state's promise of protection remains a paper plan, with no concrete action taken to safeguard the Akit people's cultural identity or land rights. This research concludes that RANHAM has been ineffective inANGKAng Village due to a fundamental breakdown in communication and implementation between central and local governments, leaving the Akit community without the intended legal and social protections.
Deconstructing the Board of Peace: A political Marxist and post-colonial analysis Siti Mawaddah Palamani; Satya Wira Wicaksana
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 7 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i7.2072

Abstract

This study examines the Board of Peace (BoP) as a structural embodiment of global capital mandates expressed via the discourse of rebuilding and stabilization.  Employing Political Marxism from Benno Teschke's critique of international order and its social property relations alongside Mignolo and Quijano's Coloniality of Power, Poets' Pacification Paradigm, and Mandelkern's Neoliberal Depoliticization framework, this study argues that BoP constitutes a new imperial instrument disguised as a peace institution. Analysis of primary documents such as UNSC Resolution 2803, BoP Charter, and international legal critiques, reveals critical anomalies: the charter's absence of any reference to Gaza or Palestinian self-determination; authority concentrated in a single individual without accountability mechanisms; and an economic reconstruction blueprint resembling a market-opening scheme for transnational capital rather than a people-centered recovery program. BoP ultimately represents a codification of existing power relations rather than a genuine multilateral institution.   Keywords: Board of Peace, Political Marxism, New Imperialism, Pacification, Depoliticization