Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Narcotics Brokers and Logistics Routes in Indonesia: Legal System Weaknesses from Ḥifẓ al-'Aql Perspective Muhammad Hasan Nasution; Mhd Syahnan; Mustafa Kamal Rokan
WARAQAT : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Waraqat: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam As-Sunnah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51590/waraqat.v10i2.1161

Abstract

This study examines the roles of brokers and logistics routes in Indonesia's narcotics supply chain, which has evolved into a transnational network connecting Golden Triangle production centers (particularly Myanmar's Shan State) with domestic markets through intermediate distribution nodes. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by a socio-legal approach and qualitative analysis, utilizing data from UNODC, BNN (National Narcotics Agency), Customs, and previous research reports to analyze the intersection of global economic dynamics, legal system weaknesses, and narcotics trafficking operations. Findings reveal that brokers serve three critical functions: connecting international manufacturers with domestic markets, controlling pricing mechanisms, and designing logistics routes through major ports (Tanjung Priok, Batam) and minor harbors across maritime and air channels. Indonesia's consumer market comprises approximately 3.3 million narcotics users (1.73% of the population aged 15-64 years), with high prevalence rates in North Sumatra (6.5%), South Sumatra (5%), and DKI Jakarta (3.3%). However, law enforcement remains concentrated at the downstream level, with over 70% of prosecuted cases targeting users and couriers rather than intermediate brokers. Legal system weaknesses—particularly in Money Laundering (TPPU) instruments, customs supervision, and international cooperation—enable brokers to exploit regulatory gaps and maintain network resilience despite increased arrests. From the Maqasid Syariah perspective, specifically the principle of Hifz al-'Aql (protection of reason), this study proposes non-penal policy reconstruction emphasizing preventive, educational, and rehabilitative approaches that extend beyond criminal sanctions to protect community morals, reason, and welfare through structural reforms in financial regulation, logistics supervision, and international legal diplomacy.
PENGHILANGAN HAK ASUH ANAK DARI ORANG TUA PEMAKAI NARKOTIKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA MODERN Muhammad Hasan Nasution; Fauziah Lubis; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5836

Abstract

Abstract: Parental drug abuse poses serious risks to the parenting relationship and the best interests of children. In Indonesian legal practice, state intervention in this situation is still dominated by a criminal approach through Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Rehabilitation for drug users is positioned as part of the criminal justice system, while civil implications, particularly regarding child custody, are not explicitly regulated. As a result, child protection is reactive and only implemented after a real loss has occurred. This study aims to reconstruct the removal of child custody rights from parents who use drugs as a civil legal instrument that is preventive and oriented towards child protection. This study uses normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. The results indicate that child custody is a non-absolute legal authority and can be limited if the parents are at risk, including drug abuse. The lack of norms in the Narcotics Law regarding the civil implications of parent-child relationships requires policy reconstruction towards a non-penal approach. This study proposes the removal of custody as a legitimate, preventative civil law mechanism integrated with parental rehabilitation policies to ensure more effective and equitable child protection. Keywords: Child Custody, Civil Law, Non-Penal Policy, Narcotics, Child Protection. Abstrak: Penyalahgunaan narkotika oleh orang tua menimbulkan risiko serius terhadap relasi pengasuhan dan kepentingan terbaik anak. Dalam praktik hukum di Indonesia, intervensi negara terhadap kondisi tersebut masih didominasi pendekatan pidana melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Rehabilitasi pemakai narkotika ditempatkan sebagai bagian dari sistem peradilan pidana, sementara implikasi keperdataan, khususnya terkait hak asuh anak, belum diatur secara eksplisit. Akibatnya, perlindungan anak bersifat reaktif dan baru dilakukan setelah terjadi kerugian nyata. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi penghilangan hak asuh anak dari orang tua pemakai narkotika sebagai instrumen hukum perdata yang bersifat preventif dan berorientasi perlindungan anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan filosofis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak asuh anak merupakan kewenangan hukum yang tidak absolut dan dapat dibatasi apabila orang tua berada dalam kondisi berisiko, termasuk penyalahgunaan narkotika. Kekosongan norma dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika terkait implikasi keperdataan relasi orang tua dan anak menuntut rekonstruksi kebijakan menuju pendekatan non-penal. Penelitian ini menawarkan penghilangan hak asuh sebagai mekanisme hukum perdata yang sah, preventif, dan terintegrasi dengan kebijakan rehabilitasi orang tua, guna menjamin perlindungan anak secara lebih efektif dan berkeadilan. Kata Kunci: Hak Asuh Anak, Hukum Perdata, Kebijakan Non-Penal, Narkotika, Perlindungan Anak.
Reconstructing Non-Penal Policy under Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics: A Maqāsid al-Sharīʿah Perspective Muhammad Hasan Nasution; Nispul Khoiri; Zulkarnain Zulkarnain
Lentera: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Lentera: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/lentera.v8i1.16369

Abstract

Narcotics abuse constitutes a multidimensional problem that threatens individual well-being, intellect, family integrity, social order, and national resilience. The problem lies in the fact that the non-penal policies established under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics remain fragmented, particularly in prevention, rehabilitation, community participation, and interinstitutional coordination, and have not yet formed an integrated and sustainable system of human protection. This study aims to analyze the construction of non-penal policies under Law Number 35 of 2009 and formulate their reconstruction based on Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah. Employing normative juridical research, this study uses statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with the framework of al-kulliyyāt al-khams comprising the protection of religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), intellect (ḥifẓ al-‘aql), progeny (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and property (ḥifẓ al-māl). The findings indicate that existing non-penal policies have not sufficiently integrated these five objectives because their implementation remains sectoral and discontinuous. The reconstruction establishes five interconnected pillars: prevention, rehabilitation, community participation, interinstitutional coordination, and sustainability of intervention. The implication is a shift from fragmented and predominantly reactive interventions toward an integrated, preventive, rehabilitative, participatory, coordinated, and sustainable policy framework. Such reconstruction extends protection beyond rehabilitation by strengthening family and community support, social reintegration, and the capacity of recovered individuals to live independently, productively, and with dignity.