Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Harmonisasi Pengujian Peraturan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Konstitusional Permana, Adhe; Renaldhi, Rendhi; Ambarini, Siti Nur; YL Tobing, Iyus; Sanjaya, Ihsan; Narenda, Sena; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10289

Abstract

The division of authority for judicial review of regulations between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) often leads to overlapping jurisdiction, differing standards of review, and inconsistent rulings. This situation weakens legal certainty and constitutional protection, which should form the foundation of a rule of law state. This research analyzes the source of this disharmony using a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The study's findings indicate the absence of an integrative mechanism between the two institutions to ensure the alignment of review parameters. Therefore, a harmonization model is required to clearly define the boundaries of authority, synchronize the standards of review, and strengthen the coordination of rulings. This harmonization is projected to enhance the effectiveness of constitutional control and guarantee the protection of citizens' rights more consistently.
Analisis Politik Hukum dalam Perancangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Guna Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Progresif Nurlindawati, Nurlindawati; Purwanto, Eko; Rayhan, Ahmad Zaki; Renaldhi, Rendhi; Neranda, Sena; Candra, Firman Adi; Salatun, Mochammad Ridzky
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the configuration of legal politics in the process of drafting regulations in Indonesia, particularly in the effort to synthesize the poles often considered conflicting: legal certainty and progressive justice. Using an analytical-critical approach, it is found that the legislative process is frequently trapped in political pragmatism that prioritizes legal certainty for economic interests, while neglecting responsive substantive justice. This paper proposes a synthesis where ideal legal politics must place humans as the primary subject of law, where formal certainty must not undermine substantive justice.