Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ETIKA BERBEDA PENDAPAT DALAM PERSPEKTIF MODERASI BERAGAMA Farina, Dahlia; Musdalifa, Deby Habja; Julhadi, Julhadi; Wahyuni, Sri
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): Vol. 8 No. 2 Edisi 2 Januari 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v8i2.3625

Abstract

Differences of opinion are an inherent part of Islamic intellectual tradition and become a social reality in the religious life of Indonesian Muslims. However, the emergence of digital media, shifting patterns of authority, and the increasing politicization of religious symbols often exacerbate tensions within communities. This article examines how disagreements can be managed ethically through the framework of religious moderation. Using a qualitative library research method, the study reviews classical Islamic discourses on ikhtilaf, national policy documents on religious moderation, and contemporary socio-religious dynamics in Indonesia. The findings show that conflicts rarely arise from the substance of theological or jurisprudential differences, but rather from communication patterns, emotional responses, and weak religious literacy. The principles of moderation such as balance, tolerance, anti-violence, and respect for local traditions provide a constructive approach for interacting across divergent viewpoints. The study concludes that courteous disagreement is not only an ethical imperative but also a civic necessity for sustaining social harmony in a pluralistic nation.Keywords: Disagreement, Religious Moderation, Islamic Ethics, Tolerance
Maqasid-Based Interpretation of Socio-Legal Qur’anic Verses: A Methodological Analysis of Mahmud Shaltut’s Tafsir Syafril, Syafril; Efendi, Yusuf; Farina, Dahlia; Musdalifa, Deby Habja; Ritonga, Mahyudin
Jurnal Ushuluddin Vol 33, No 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jush.v33i1.38815

Abstract

This article examines Mahmud Shaltut’s interpretation of socio-legal Qur’anic verses through a maqasid al-shari‘ah–based approach, focusing on its methodologicalframeworkand implications for contemporary Islamic legal thought. Employing qualitative library research with a descriptive-analytical design, the study analyzes Shaltut’s exegetical works—particularly Tafsiral-Qur’anal-Kari and Al-Islam‘Aqidah waSyari‘ah—usingqualitative content analysis. The findings reveal that Shaltut positions maqasid al-shari‘ah not merely as a complementaryprinciplebut as a central hermeneutical framework guiding socio-legal interpretation. Through a thematic analysis of three key issues—women’s leadership (Q.S. An-Nisa’: 34), interreligious relations and peace (Q.S. Al-Baqarah: 256; Al-Anfal: 61), and economic justice (Q.S. Al-Baqarah: 275–280)—this study demonstrates that Shaltut consistently applies a tripartite model of ijtihad that integrates textual analysis, socio-historical context, and the higher objectives of Islamic law. His interpretive approach prioritizes the spirit of the law (ruh al-tashri‘), substantive justice, and public welfare (maslahah), allowing for contextual legal reconstruction without undermining the authority of the Qur’anic text. This study concludes that Shaltut’s maqasid-based tafsir represents a contextual-progressive exegetical modelthat significantlycontributes to the development of contemporary socio-legal hermeneutics and offers a viable methodological foundation for addressing issues of gender justice, peaceful interreligious coexistence, and equitable economicsystems.