Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an,Tafsirdan Pemikiran Islam INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Hasfiana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Model Kesabaran Qur’ani: Studi Tematik Pada Ayat-Ayat Tentang Resiliensi Kesabaran Hasfiana; Andi Miswar; Halimah Basri
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

resilience through a thematic tafsir approach. The study aims to formulate a conceptual model of patience that goes beyond a purely normative ethical attitude and functions as an integrated mechanism of inner resilience shaping faith, psychological stability, and spiritual maturity. The primary data consist of selected Qur’anic verses, particularly QS. Al-Baqarah [2]:153 and 155, QS. Ar-Ra‘d [13]:22, QS. Al-A‘raf [7]:200, and QS. Al-Anfal [8]:46, which are analyzed through a synthetic reading of classical and contemporary Qur’anic exegesis. The findings indicate that Qur’anic patience operates in a layered and systemic manner, encompassing the strengthening of faith, Qur’an-based cognitive reframing of trials, spiritual tranquility through worship and isti‘ādhah, adaptive moral behavior, and self-transformation through life’s challenges. This model demonstrates that patience in the Qur’anic perspective is not a passive form of endurance, but an active spiritual force that enables individuals to remain resilient, adaptive, and growth-oriented amid adversity. Consequently, Qur’anic patience functions as a foundational framework of spiritual resilience that structures continuous faith development at both personal and social levels.
Population and Sample as Methodological Basis in Educational Research Hasfiana; Syarifuddin Ondeng; Ulfiani Rahman
INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/interdisiplin.v3i1.145

Abstract

Population and sampling are fundamental methodological components that determine the validity, reliability, and generalizability of educational research findings. Inadequate determination of population boundaries, inappropriate sampling techniques, or improper sample size selection may lead to biased conclusions and weaken the scientific credibility of research outcomes. This study aims to critically examine the concepts of population and sample as methodological foundations in educational research. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach through library research, this study analyzes and synthesizes relevant methodological literature and scholarly articles using content analysis techniques. The findings indicate that population serves as the basis for defining the scope of research generalization, while samples function as representative subsets selected through systematic procedures. Effective sampling requires careful consideration of sample size adequacy, sampling techniques, population characteristics, and desired levels of precision and confidence. The study also highlights fundamental differences in sampling practices between quantitative and qualitative research paradigms, where quantitative research emphasizes statistical representativeness, whereas qualitative research prioritizes data saturation and contextual depth. This article contributes to methodological discourse by providing a systematic conceptual clarification of population and sampling frameworks, particularly for novice researchers in education. A comprehensive understanding of these concepts is essential to designing rigorous, credible, and impactful educational research.
Co-Authors Andi Miswar Halimah Basri Syarifuddin Ondeng Ulfiani Rahman