Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Fundamental Justice AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro
I Kadek Sudiarsana
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
SINKRONISASI REGULASI PEMBAYARAN TUNAI DAN NON-TUNAI: ANTARA INOVASI DIGITAL DAN KEPATUHAN PADA UU MATA UANG Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian; I Kadek Sudiarsana; Gegana, Reza Pramasta; Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Fithrian; Fajrin, Fera Wulandari; Raden, Andi Nur Fikriana Aulia
JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): JUSTITIABLE -Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56071/justitiable.v8i2.1720

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulatory synchronization between innovations in digital payment systems and the obligation to use physical currency (cash) as a lawful means of payment. The principal issue examined is the growing prevalence of exclusive cashless policies adopted by business actors, which, in legal terms, result in the refusal to accept cash rupiah. The research employs a normative juridical method, using a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The findings indicate that the unilateral refusal to accept cash constitutes a violation of mandatory legal norms, rendering such agreements null and void by operation of law. From a sociological perspective, these policies create barriers to economic access for unbanked populations as well as for elderly groups. The study concludes that a policy reorientation is necessary to ensure the implementation of the mandate of Article 23 of the Currency Law. Accordingly, this research recommends the application of graduated administrative sanctions, ranging from financial penalties to the suspension of QRIS services, in order to ensure inclusivity and legal certainty within the national payment system.
Constitutional Complaints and the Constitutionality of Pro Justitia Measures: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia, Germany, and South Korea Ivan Zairani Lisi; Nur Aripkah; I Kadek Sudiarsana; Nadia Nabela; Faiqah Nur Azizah
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v52.28316

Abstract

In practice, pretrial hearings in Indonesia often fail to be an effective instrument for protecting the rights of suspects and victims in the Pro Justitia process. Many cases show that the imbalance between law enforcement officials' authority and individual rights remains an unresolved. This situation differs from that in Germany and South Korea, where constitutional complaints have become an important instrument in the constitutional system for controlling and correcting state actions that violate citizens' constitutional rights, including within the criminal justice system. This study examines the extent to which the absence of a constitutional complaint mechanism in the Indonesian criminal justice system affects the protection of citizens' constitutional rights. Using a normative legal research method, with a statute, conceptual, and comparative approach, this study found that Indonesia has yet to implement a constitutional complaint mechanism as a corrective measure against state actions that violate citizens' constitutional rights. Preliminary hearings still have limitations in accommodating constitutional rights in criminal proceedings. The absence of this mechanism creates a void in the constitutional protection system in the judicial process in Indonesia as a whole. The implementation of constitutional complaints should be considered to strengthen the protection of constitutional rights and ensure the implementation of the Pro Justitia process in line with the principles of the rule of law
Implikasi Yuridis Pedoman Pemidanaan KUHP Nasional terhadap Eksistensi Ketentuan Pidana Minimal Khusus Aripkah, Nur; M. Ramzi Maulana; I Kadek Sudiarsana
Jurnal Fundamental Justice Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026 : In Press
Publisher : Universitas Bumigora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30812/fundamental.v7i1.6187

Abstract

 Pembaruan hukum pidana KUHP Nasional menandai pergeseran paradigma pemidanaan dari pendekatan retributif menuju sistem yang lebih humanis, proporsional, dan berorientasi tujuan. Salah satu pembaruan fundamental terletak pada perumusan pedoman pemidanaan dalam Pasal 53 sampai dengan Pasal 54 KUHP Nasional, yang kemudian diperkuat melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pidana, khususnya terkait penghapusan ketentuan pidana minimum khusus dalam berbagai undang-undang sektoral. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis pedoman pemidanaan KUHP Nasional terhadap eksistensi dan keberlakuan ketentuan pidana minimum khusus dalam sistem pemidanaan Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan, melalui penelaahan terhadap ketentuan KUHP Nasional, Undang-Undang Penyesuaian Pidana, serta doktrin dan praktik pemidanaan modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pedoman pemidanaan KUHP Nasional menggeser orientasi pemidanaan dari sistem yang kaku dan berbasis angka menuju pemidanaan yang menekankan proporsionalitas, individualisasi pidana, dan keadilan substantif. Penghapusan pidana minimum khusus memberikan ruang diskresi yang lebih luas bagi hakim, namun tetap dibingkai oleh pedoman normatif untuk mencegah disparitas dan kesewenang-wenangan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pedoman pemidanaan merupakan instrumen kunci dalam sistem pemidanaan modern dan perlu dioptimalkan melalui penguatan kapasitas hakim serta harmonisasi lanjutan terhadap undang-undang sektoral agar selaras dengan tujuan pemidanaan yang korektif, rehabilitatif, dan restorative. 
Co-Authors Faiqah Nur Azizah Fajrin, Fera Wulandari Fithrian Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Ivan Zairani Lisi M. Ramzi Maulana Nadia Nabela Nur Aripkah Raden, Andi Nur Fikriana Aulia Reza Pramasta Gegana Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian