Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Rekonstruksi Penerapan Asas Ne Bis In Idem dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang: Analisis Putusan Nomor 31/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst Permatasari, Nengsarah; Anwar, Syahrul; Suradi, Suradi
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 1 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i1.3082

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan asas ne bis in idem dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nomor 31/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst yang menyatakan seluruh dakwaan pencucian uang sebagai ne bis in idem terhadap perkara korupsi sebelumnya. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 29/PUU-XIV/2016, serta yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim mayoritas menafsirkan “perbuatan yang sama” secara faktual melalui kesamaan pelaku, waktu, tempat, dan objek harta, tanpa menguji secara substantif unsur penyamaran atau pengaburan asal-usul harta sebagai elemen khusus tindak pidana pencucian uang. Sebaliknya, dissenting opinion Hakim Anggota II lebih konsisten dengan kerangka normatif karena menegaskan perbedaan unsur dan tujuan kriminalisasi antara tindak pidana korupsi sebagai predicate crime dan tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagai delik lanjutan yang berdiri sendiri. Penelitian ini merekonstruksi batas penerapan asas ne bis in idem dengan menegaskan bahwa pemidanaan pencucian uang tidak dapat dianggap tertutup hanya karena adanya kesamaan rangkaian peristiwa, sepanjang unsur penyamaran belum pernah diperiksa dalam perkara sebelumnya.
COMPARISON OF THE APPLICATION OF RESPONSIVE LEGAL THEORY IN RESPONDING TO SOCIAL CHANGE IN THE CRIMINAL LAW AND CIVIL LAW Afaf Naufal Pahlevi; Permatasari, Nengsarah; Dede Kania
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v15i1.40023

Abstract

Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick stated that responsive law is a law that is oriented to the fulfillment of social needs and is able to adapt according to the dynamics of society. This study aims to compare the application of responsive legal theory in responding to social changes in the field of criminal and civil law. The research method used is normative or doctrinal legal research with a conceptual and comparative approach. The conceptual approach is used to understand the basic principles of responsive legal theory that emphasize legal flexibility in dealing with social dynamics. A comparative approach is applied to analyze the similarities and differences in the application of this theory in criminal and civil law. The results show that the application of responsive law theory in criminal law tends to focus on the rehabilitation of perpetrators and the restoration of social relations through a restorative justice approach. On the other hand, in civil law, this theory is implemented through flexible alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation and arbitration, which considers substantive justice for the parties to the dispute. Although the goals and processes in these two areas of law are different, they emphasize the need for legal adaptation to social changes and societal needs. Thus, responsive legal theory is expected to be able to create a legal system that is more inclusive, fair, and relevant to the development of Indonesian society. Keywords: Civil Law, Criminal Law, Responsive legal theory, Social Change.