Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Journal of Innovative and Creativity Proceedings Law, Accounting, Business, Economics and Language (LABEL)
Abram Sahing
Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Komparatif antara Ahli Waris Pengganti dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Plaatsvervulling dalam KUHPerdata: Studi Literatur dan Yurisprudensi Muhamad Habib; Abram Sahing; Fredy Ied Fitriadi; Fasub Hanal; Thomas Mulyanto; Aldhitama Ramadhan
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.1891

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas perbandingan antara konsep ahli waris pengganti dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) dengan konsep plaatsvervulling dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata). Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan studi literatur dan analisis yurisprudensi untuk menggali aspek normatif, struktural, dan praktik pengadilan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun keduanya mengakui prinsip penggantian hak waris, terdapat perbedaan mendasar dalam aspek normatif dan kepastian hukumnya. KHI lebih menekankan asas keadilan substantif yang berbasis maqashid syariah, namun masih bersifat tentatif dalam penerapannya. Sementara KUHPerdata memberikan kepastian hukum yang lebih eksplisit, namun kurang mempertimbangkan nilai-nilai kekeluargaan. Implikasi dari perbedaan ini menyentuh aspek sosial, hukum, dan perlindungan hak waris di tengah masyarakat Indonesia yang plural. Oleh karena itu, harmonisasi antara kedua sistem ini menjadi penting dalam mewujudkan keadilan hukum yang inklusif.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KASUS-KASUS MALPRAKTIK OLEH TENAGA KESEHATAN NON-DOKTER DI RUMAH SAKIT Abram Sahing; Rina Arum Prastyanti; Uli Kristiani Saragih
Proceedings Law, Accounting, Business, Economics and Language Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Persepektif Ekonomi,Hukum, dan Komunikasi Dalam Bisn
Publisher : Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Medical malpractice by non-physician health workers is a significant issue in Indonesia's healthcare system. Nurses and midwives, whether acting independently or under delegation from physicians, are at risk of exceeding their authority, which can result in legal consequences. This study aims to analyze the forms of malpractice committed by non-doctor health personnel, the legal regulations governing such acts, and the applicable legal liabilities. The research uses a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Findings indicate regulatory weaknesses, overlapping institutional authority, and insufficient legal education among health workers, leading to ineffective handling of malpractice cases. Legal reform is needed through technical SOP formulation, strengthening of medical record systems, and continuous legal education for non-physician health personnel.
Model PIKAT: A Normative Remuneration Framework for Nurses Performing Delegated Medical Procedures in Private Hospitals Abram Sahing
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/dz3q7a08

Abstract

The delegation of medical procedures from physicians to nurses is a common practice in hospital healthcare services. However, Indonesian health regulations do not explicitly govern nurses' entitlement to remuneration for delegated medical procedures, creating a legal vacuum and potential legal uncertainty. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing nurses' remuneration rights in delegated medical procedures in private hospitals and to develop a normative remuneration calculation model. This research employs a normative legal approach using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case analyses. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were analyzed qualitatively based on Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The findings reveal that existing health legislation does not provide a standardized legal mechanism for determining remuneration for nurses performing delegated medical procedures, leaving remuneration systems largely dependent on internal hospital policies. As its primary contribution, this study proposes the PIKAT Model (Competency-Based Remuneration Calculation for Medical Procedures), which incorporates weighted parameters including legal authority, professional competence, procedural complexity, clinical risk, professional responsibility, service contribution, quality of care, performance, institutional factors, and professional ethics. The model provides a normative framework that promotes legal certainty, distributive justice, and practical utility, while offering a policy reference for remuneration systems in private hospitals and future healthcare regulatory reforms.
Co-Authors Aldhitama Ramadhan Fasub Hanal Fredy Ied Fitriadi Muhamad Habib Rina Arum Prastyanti Thomas Mulyanto Uli Kristiani Saragih