Wijayanti Eka Suryandari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Konsep Keadilan Gender dalam Perspektif Islam Wijayanti Eka Suryandari; Mustamin Giling
Al-Kindi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Al-Kindi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of gender justice from an Islamic perspective by comparing it to Western feminist theories. The study aims to answer the question of whether Islam views gender equality as a form of social justice or whether it has its own principles distinct from the Western paradigm. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method with a library research approach. This research focuses on several issues: 1) What are the origins of gender formation? 2) Is gender influenced by biological factors or is it purely a social construct? Data were obtained from classical and contemporary literature discussing the concepts of gender, feminism, and justice in Islam, and then analyzed comparatively. The results show that Islam has upheld the principle of justice for men and women from the beginning through the teachings of monotheism, which place both men and women equal before God with complementary social roles. The differences in rights and responsibilities between the two are not a form of injustice, but rather a manifestation of the balance of functions in accordance with human nature.
Penghentian Ijtihad dan Dampaknya terhadap Pembaruan Hukum Islam di Indonesia Wijayanti Eka Suryandari; Mustamin Giling
Al-Kindi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Al-Kindi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The discourse surrounding the closure of the door of ijtihad has shaped Islamic legal thought for centuries, yet its historical validity and contemporary implications remain contested. This article critically examines the construction of the cessation of ijtihad both as a historical narrative and as an ongoing epistemological challenge, with particular attention to its impact on Islamic legal reform in Indonesia. Using a qualitative-normative legal research methodology grounded in historical, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes how the narrative of stagnation emerged through the convergence of Orientalist scholarship, internal juridical developments, and the political co-optation of religious authority. This research demonstrates that Indonesia presents a unique laboratory for observing the tension between stagnation and renewal of ijtihad, characterized by the coexistence of institutionalized collective ijtihad (through the MUI and NU), progressive judicial reasoning (exemplified by the Supreme Court ruling on wajibah wills), and persistent methodological contestation between maqāṣid-oriented reform and neo-literalist pressures. The central argument of this article is that the "closed door" metaphor is historically inaccurate and theologically problematic, yet its effective power as a disciplinary mechanism continues to constrain legal innovation. The novelty of this research lies in its integrated analytical framework that synthesizes critical historiography of ijtihad, socio-legal institutional analysis, and a case study of contemporary Indonesia to propose a contextualized model of ijtihad that bridges classical methodology with modern legal challenges.
Wakaf dalam Perspektif Fiqh: Analisis Komparatif Mazhab dan Relevansinya di Era Kontemporer Wijayanti Eka Suryandari; Rifaldi Ahmad; Agung Nasir; Basaria Nainggolang; Marwa
Al-Kindi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Al-Kindi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Waqf is a socio-religious institution in Islam that plays a strategic role in developing the welfare of the community. This article analyzes waqf from a fiqh perspective using a comparative approach between schools of thought, covering the definition, legal basis, pillars, conditions, types, and differences of opinion among classical and contemporary scholars. This research uses a normative legal research method with a comparative-school approach and a conceptual approach. Through a study of the Qur'an, hadith, authorized fiqh books, contemporary fatwas, and laws and regulations, this study finds that differences in views between schools, especially regarding the ownership status of waqf assets, the permanence of waqf objects, and the permissibility of cash waqf, stem from differences in istinbath methodology. The findings indicate that the flexibility of waqf fiqh, particularly in the Hanafi and Maliki schools of thought, opens up space for innovation in productive waqf management in the modern era. This article recommends a revitalization of waqf fiqh that is responsive to contemporary challenges without abandoning the fundamental principles of sharia