Rosi Nasution, Dinda Aurelia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Cyber Fraud Berbasis Rekayasa Sosial Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Tanwijaya, Patrisia; Chosaf, Najla Azrijal; Marpaung, Michelle Evelyn; Wibowo, Keisha Zahra; Siadari, Dyo Ganda; Rosi Nasution, Dinda Aurelia; Yohanes Simarmata, Boy Gabriel; Alexander, Ariel; Ginting, Yuni Priskila; Raja Sihombing, Andreas Bintang
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 5 No 01 (2026): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v5i01.3261

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah meningkatkan intensitas kejahatan siber berbasis rekayasa sosial yang memanfaatkan manipulasi psikologis untuk memperoleh akses ilegal terhadap data pribadi dan aset digital korban. Cyber fraud tidak hanya menimbulkan kerugian finansial yang signifikan, tetapi juga berpotensi merusak kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem elektronik dan ekosistem ekonomi digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku cyber fraud berbasis rekayasa sosial dalam sistem hukum Indonesia melalui kajian terhadap penerapan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi, serta Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang baru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan pelaku cyber fraud berbasis rekayasa sosial telah memenuhi unsur actus reus, mens rea, serta kemampuan bertanggung jawab, sehingga pelaku dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana secara penuh. Sistem hukum Indonesia pada prinsipnya telah memiliki dasar normatif yang cukup komprehensif dalam menanggulangi kejahatan tersebut. Namun, efektivitas penegakan hukum masih bergantung pada peningkatan kapasitas forensik digital, optimalisasi koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum, serta penguatan kebijakan preventif melalui literasi digital masyarakat.
The Role of Mobile Forensics as Electronic Evidence in Proving Murder Cases Raja Sihombing, Andreas Bintang; Tanwijaya, Patrisia; Chosaf, Najla Azrijal; Marpaung, Michelle Evelyn; Wibowo, Keisha Zahra; Siadari, Dyo Ganda; Rosi Nasution, Dinda Aurelia; Yohanes Simarmata, Boy Gabriel; Alexander, Ariel; Ginting, Yuni Priskila
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v4i02.2754

Abstract

This study examines the role of mobile forensics as electronic evidence in proving murder crimes in Indonesia amidst the increasing complexity of crimes and perpetrators' efforts to eliminate digital traces. The study uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach through a literature review of relevant laws and regulations, court decisions, and scientific literature. The results of the study indicate that mobile forensics has an important position in the criminal evidence system because it is able to produce legally valid electronic information and/or electronic documents as recognized in the Criminal Procedure Code, the ITE Law, and strengthened by Constitutional Court Decisions. In murder cases, mobile forensics plays a strategic role in tracing communications, locations, metadata, and digital activities to reconstruct the chronology of events, identify the perpetrator, and strengthen the judge's conviction. However, the strength of its evidence is highly dependent on the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of the data, as well as compliance with legal procedures such as chain of custody, lawful seizure, and the involvement of digital forensic experts. This study concludes that mobile forensics has become an important instrument in modern criminal law evidence, but its optimization still faces challenges in the form of lack of uniform operational standards, limited human resources, and the need to strengthen regulations to create legal certainty, justice, and effective law enforcement in the digital era.