Riza, Dola
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tamansiswa

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Pengaturan Pengajuan Gugatan Yang Melalui Upaya Administratif Berupa Banding Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan Riza, Dola; Meita Lefi Kurnia; Boiziardi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 4 (2024): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Januari 2024)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.439

Abstract

Pengaturan pengajuan gugatan yang melalui upaya administratif berupa banding menurut undang-undang peradilan tata usaha negara dan undang-undang administrasi pemerintahan telah diatur dalam UU PTUN. Setelah diundangkannya UU Administrasi Pemerintahanan, hal ini juga turut diatur dalam UU Administrasi Pemerintahan, namun terdapat perbedaan dalam pengaturan tersebut. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana pengaturan pengajuan gugatan yang melalui upaya administratif berupa banding menurut undang-undang peradilan tata usaha negara dan undang-undang administrasi pemerintahan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan, pengaturan untuk hukum materil berpedoman kepada UU Administrasi Pemerintahan dan hukum formil tetap berpedoman kepada UU PTUN.
Analisis Yuridis Peran Amicus Curae Dalam Sengketa Hasil Pilpres Di Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Kasus : Perkara PHPU.PRES/XXII/2024) Lefi, Meita; Riza, Dola; Fepriana, Rani
Normative Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2026): Normative: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tamansiswa Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The dispute over the 2024 Presidential Election (Pilpres) results at the Constitutional Court (MK) has become a public spotlight, particularly with the emergence of the amicus curiae phenomenon, or "friend of the court." This study analyzes the legal role of amicus curiae in the context of the 2024 Presidential Election PHPU (Public Order Dispute Resolution) trial. Although already present in Indonesian legal practice, the involvement of amicus curiae on an unprecedented scale in this PHPU case is an interesting phenomenon to study. Using normative methods with a qualitative approach, this study analyzes trial documents, Constitutional Court decisions, as well as media coverage and official statements related to the submission of amicus curiae. The results show that the submission of 48 amicus curiae reflects high public participation and concern for the integrity of democracy and justice. However, the role of amicus curiae remains facilitative and not binding on the judges' decisions. Their presence serves as voices of public interest, provides additional legal and factual perspectives, and encourages judges' accountability in deciding crucial cases. This study concludes that the amicus curiae phenomenon in the 2024 Presidential PHPU sets an important precedent for increasing public participation in the oversight of constitutional judicial processes in Indonesia, while also highlighting the potential and challenges of amicus curiae arrangements in the future.