Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A pragmatic analysis of the implicatures in the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s speech recognizing the State of Palestine Rjoub, Maysam Mohammad; Eshreteh, Dr. Mahmood
Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Mitra Persada Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58881/jllscs.v4i1.450

Abstract

This research examines the pragmatic analysis of the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's speech announcing the official recognition of the State of Palestine on September 21, 2025. Using Grice's conversational maxims quality, quantity, manner and relation, the speech is analyzed and its deliberate violations are exposed, with a focus on how these violations that generate implicit meanings that reflect the UK's diplomatic position. By applying a qualitative descriptive analytical framework, the research explores deliberate ambiguities, strategic omissions, and indirect language that serve the UK's international and domestic political objectives. The findings reveal that the discourse employs pragmatic strategies to balance support for Israel's security with recognition of a Palestinian state, justifying political decisions while appeasing public opinion. The analysis highlights the role of language as a tool for persuasion, negotiation, and justification in sensitive political issues, contributing to a deeper understanding of how political discourse shapes international relations.
Enhancing critical reading skills through summarizing and paraphrasing strategies to improve comprehension and analytical thinking in learners Ovieta, Pande Putu Resmia; Sanjaya, I Nyoman Suka; Ali, Zulfiqar; Akdemir, Ahmet Selçuk; Ayub, Sadia; Eshreteh, Dr. Mahmood; Gündoğan, Selinay
Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Mitra Persada Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58881/jlps.v5i1.82

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of summarizing and paraphrasing techniques in enhancing reading skills, particularly focusing on developing critical reading abilities. The research employs a mixed-methods approach involving a quasi-experimental design complemented by qualitative analysis. Participants included high school students divided into experimental and control groups; the experimental group received targeted instruction in summarizing and paraphrasing strategies within the context of critical reading exercises. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests assessing reading comprehension and critical thinking, alongside observation and interviews to gain insights into students’ engagement and strategy application. The analysis revealed that students trained in summarizing and paraphrasing demonstrated significant improvement in identifying main ideas, synthesizing information, and evaluating textual arguments compared to the control group. Qualitative findings underscored enhanced metacognitive awareness and deeper engagement with texts when students actively practiced these strategies. The results support the hypothesis that integrating summarizing and paraphrasing into critical reading instruction promotes not only comprehension but also analytical skills essential for academic success. In conclusion, this study highlights the pedagogical value of explicit instruction in summarizing and paraphrasing to cultivate critical reading competencies. It recommends incorporating these strategies systematically in reading curricula to foster higher-order thinking and empower students to become independent, reflective readers.