Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Suara Hukum Asshika: Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning Cigarskruie: Journal of Educational and Islamic Research
Zaynab Omar
University of Zawia
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Lecturers’ Perceptions of Integrating Islamic Environmental Ethics into Sustainability Education Laylay Hasan; Zaynab Omar; Karima Elhaj; Abdulrauf Atia; Entisar Alatrish; Fatima Alsaeh; Mohamed Elbi
Cigarskruie: Journal of Educational and Islamic Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): September
Publisher : Saniya Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65190/cigarskruie.v3i1.466

Abstract

This study examines lecturers’ perceptions of integrating Islamic environmental ethics in sustainability education in Libyan higher education institutions. Using a mixed-methods design, survey data were collected from 150 lecturers at the University of Zawia using a 21item questionnaire covering conceptual understanding, perceived importance, teaching practices, perceived outcomes, institutional support, and challenges/professional needs. Semi-structured interviews with 10 lecturers were conducted to contextualize and explain the quantitative patterns. Quantitative findings showed strong support to the conceptual coherence and importance of Islamic environmental ethics for sustainability education, with high perceived student outcomes, but only moderate levels of reported teaching practices. Institutional support received the lowest ratings and showed high variability, while professional development and time constraints emerged as notable needs. Qualitative themes indicated that lecturers commonly anchor sustainability in Islamic concepts such as khilafah (stewardship), amanah (trust), mizan (balance), and harm prevention, and report higher student engagement when sustainability is framed as moral accountability and identity-consistent learning. However, implementation was constrained by limited structured programs, scarce teaching materials, lack of locally grounded Libyan case resources, and challenges in assessing ethical learning outcomes. The study suggests implementation pathway from ethical integration to pedagogical translation and institutional enabling conditions, offering implications for curriculum design, staff development, and policy to support scalable integration in Libyan universities.
Lexical, Syntactic, and Terminological Errors in Arabic-English Legal Translation among Undergraduate Students Mowafg Abrahem; Abdulrauf Atia; Laylay Hasan; Karima Elhaj; Entisar Alatrish; Safa Alrumayh; Zaynab Omar
Asshika: Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Saniya Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65190/asshika.v2i2.470

Abstract

This study examines the main error patterns found in Arabic-English legal translation among undergraduate students at the Faculty of Languages and Translation, University of Zawia, Libya. It seeks to identify the most frequent lexical, syntactic, and terminological errors in students’ translations and to explain these errors in relation to legal translation competence and teaching needs. The study used a corpus-based descriptive error-analysis design. Sixty undergraduate students enrolled in legal translation courses participated in the study. Each student translated a selected legal text from Arabic into English under controlled classroom conditions, and the translated scripts were compiled into a learner corpus for analysis. The findings showed a total of 538 errors across three main categories: terminological, syntactic, and lexical. Terminological errors were the most frequent, representing 45.2% of all errors, followed by syntactic errors at 31.8%, while lexical errors accounted for 23.0%. The results showed that students had the greatest difficulty in rendering specialized legal concepts accurately, maintaining terminological consistency, and distinguishing technical legal meanings from ordinary vocabulary. Syntactic difficulties also appeared in sentence structure, word order, passive voice, and the handling of complex legal clauses. The study concludes that students’ problems in legal translation may stem from limited exposure to authentic legal discourse, insufficient training in legal terminology, and overreliance on general translation strategies. The findings underline the need for more specialized, genre-based, and terminology-focused legal translation instruction in Libyan higher education.
Polygamy Regulation and Human Rights: The Role of Judicial Governance in Libyan Family Law Mowafg Masuwd; Sami Barkah; Salem Aladi; Safa Alrumayh; Laylay Hasan; Zaynab Omar; Nahid Ayad
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n1.p167-190

Abstract

This study analyzes the judicial regulation of polygamy in the Libyan family law using socio-legal and maqasid al-shariʿah framework. Focusing on Law No. 10 of 1984 on Marriage and Divorce and its amendments (1991, 1994, and the 2015 deletion of Article 13), the study traces how polygamy shifted from jurisprudential (fiqhi) permissibility to judicial restriction subject to authorization, contestation, and potential refusal. Using qualitative doctrinal analysis supported by socio-legal contextualization, the research examines how the authorization mechanisms have transformed polygamy from a private spousal privilege to a legally conditioned practice subject to state supervision and refusal. The findings show an institutional shift in the role of Libyan courts from verifying formal requirements to evaluating financial capacity, potential harm, and family welfare, especially after the 1994 “serious reasons” standard. The article argues that these restrictions are better understood as a maqasid-oriented understanding of justice and harm prevention rather than as a departure from Shariʿah. By linking statutory law, judicial discretion power, and socio-political context, the study contributes to the continuous debates on Islamic family law reform, the role of courts in Muslim-majority countries, and the normative foundations for regulating marital practices.
Co-Authors Abdulrauf Atia Entisar Alatrish Fatima Alsaeh Karima Elhaj Laylay Hasan Mohamed Elbi Mowafg Abrahem Mowafg Abrahem Masuwd Nahid Ayad Safa Alrumayh Salem Aladi Sami Barkah