Ellectrananda Anugerah Ash-shidiqqi
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reformulating the Legal and Institutional Mandate of BNPB in Disaster Mitigation Policy Ellectrananda Anugerah Ash-shidiqqi; Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas; Mutiara Dwi Sari
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v2i01.46925

Abstract

Disaster mitigation in Indonesia requires a coherent and adaptive institutional framework capable of addressing the country’s high vulnerability to natural hazards. The National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), as the central authority for disaster management, faces persistent challenges in coordination, regulatory fragmentation, and institutional rigidity that undermine its capacity for effective mitigation. This article examines the need to reconstruct the legal and institutional architecture of BNPB to strengthen its preventive and risk reduction functions. Using a qualitative juridical-normative approach combined with policy analysis, the study explores the alignment between existing disaster laws, decentralization policies, and international disaster governance standards such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. The findings reveal that BNPB’s current legal mandate remains overly response-oriented, lacking clear authority and integration mechanisms with regional disaster agencies (BPBD) and sectoral institutions. Therefore, the paper proposes a reconstruction model emphasizing legal harmonization, institutional redesign, and collaborative governance among central and local actors. Such a transformation is expected to shift BNPB’s paradigm from reactive disaster response toward proactive, community-based, and sustainable disaster mitigation—anchored in legal certainty, institutional accountability, and resilience-oriented policy coherence.
Islamic Ethical Governance of Post-Disaster Recovery: Advancing Inclusive Education, Gender Equality, and Decent Work for Vulnerable Communities Ellectrananda Anugerah Ash-shidiqqi; Ahmad Nailul; Joko Ismono; Suryanti Suryanti; Indra Budi Jaya
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.67

Abstract

Natural disasters generate profound socio-economic disruptions that disproportionately affect vulnerable workers, including informal laborers, women, persons with disabilities, and low-income communities. Despite growing attention to disaster governance and social protection, existing frameworks remain fragmented and often lack an ethical foundation capable of integrating social justice, economic inclusion, and long-term resilience. This study aims to develop an integrative conceptual model grounded in Islamic ethics to support inclusive post-disaster recovery for vulnerable workers. Employing a normative-conceptual approach, the study analyzes relevant scholarly literature, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 4, 5, and 8), and Islamic legal-ethical perspectives. The findings propose a framework that synthesizes three core Islamic ethical principles ‘adl (justice), ta‘āwun (mutual cooperation), and maṣlaḥah (public welfare) with four interrelated pillars: inclusive education, gender equality, decent work, and disaster resilience. The model demonstrates that inclusive education enhances adaptive capacity, gender equality promotes equitable participation and access, decent work facilitates sustainable livelihood recovery, and disaster resilience strengthens long-term socio-economic stability. Theoretically, this study advances the discourse on Islamic social protection by bridging Islamic ethical principles with contemporary development and disaster recovery agendas. Practically, it offers a culturally grounded and value-based framework for policymakers and humanitarian actors seeking to design more equitable, inclusive, and sustainable recovery strategies. The proposed model contributes to the development of ethically informed disaster governance that prioritizes human dignity, social protection, and economic inclusion for vulnerable populations.