Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Urgency of Anti-Corruption Education as a Preventive Instrument in Law Enforcement in Indonesia: A Normative Study of Article 2, Article 3, and Article 12B of the Anti-Corruption Law Ardhian Lukman Hakim; Suyanto
JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research) Vol 11 No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/r38w9361

Abstract

Corruption remains one of the structural problems that continues to pose a serious challange to the legal system i Indonesia. So Far efforts to combat corruption have largely focused on represive approach through criminal law enforcement. However, such approaches have not been fully effective  in sustainably reducing  corruption rates. Therefore, a more comprehensive approach  is needed through preventive instruments, one of which is anti-corruption education. This study aims to analyze the position of anti corruption education  as a preventive instrumentin law enforcement in Indonesia and to examine the relevance of Article 2,3  and 12 B of the Anti Corruption Law in supportig the Effort. This research employs a normative legal  research method  using a status approach and a conceptual approach. The data used consist primary and secondary legal materials which are analyzed qualitatively. The result of the study indicate that anti corruption education has a strategic position as  a preventive instrument in law enforcement as it is capable of fostering legal awarenessand individual integrity  from an early stage .Furthermore articles 2 and 3  provide a normative basis regarding forms of corruption that must be prevented while Article 12 B on Gratuities  strengthens the importance of public understanding of corruptpractice in everyday life. Thus the integration of penal and non penal aproavhes through anti corruption education is essential in creating a more effective and sustainable lw enforcement in Indonesia.
Keabsahan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dalam Jual Beli Rumah oleh Developer yang Tidak Memenuhi Persyaratan Perizinan Ardhian Lukman Hakim; Suyanto; Ika Ayudyanti
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4641

Abstract

Eksistensi yuridis Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) yang diterbitkan oleh pengembang tanpa kelengkapan perizinan menjadi problematika hukum yang krusial di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keabsahan PPJB tersebut ditinjau dari syarat sah perjanjian dalam Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata serta implikasi yuridisnya terhadap perlindungan konsumen. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PPJB tanpa dukungan IMB/PBG, kepastian hak atas tanah, dan keterbangunan minimal 20% mengalami cacat substansial pada syarat "objek tertentu" dan "kausa yang halal". Ketidakpatuhan terhadap Pasal 42 UU Perumahan dan Pasal 5 Permen PUPR No. 22/PM/2021 menyebabkan kontrak rentan dinyatakan batal demi hukum (null and void) melalui doktrin piercing the contract veil jika terbukti terdapat unsur dolus. Secara praktis, kondisi ini menjebak konsumen dalam situasi legal limbo dengan recovery rate yang rendah saat terjadi wanprestasi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan reformasi regulasi melalui institusionalisasi PPJB Notarial dan penerapan mekanisme escrow account guna menjamin kepastian hukum yang paripurna bagi pembeli.