Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Fristia Berdian Tamza
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP: Pergeseran Sanksi dari Pidana Penjara ke Pidana Administratif Armanda Armanda; Fristia Berdian Tamza; Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.4594

Abstract

This research analyzes the paradigm shift in corporate criminal liability following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP), which replaces the old Criminal Code. The new KUHP brings significant changes to the punishment of corporations, particularly by introducing and strengthening administrative criminal sanctions as an alternative or addition to conventional criminal sanctions. Previously, the imposition of imprisonment on corporate management was often the main focus, which was considered less effective in comprehensively addressing corporate crime and less oriented toward restoration.This shift reflects a global trend to focus on compliance, prevention, and restoration of losses caused by corporate crime. The 2023 KUHP facilitates the imposition of more specific and adaptive sanctions, such as fines with more detailed calculations, freezing of business licenses, and restoration obligations. This reconstruction aims to ensure the effectiveness of corporate criminal law enforcement that is more targeted, by prioritizing the liability of the corporation itself and not solely its management.
Tujuan Hukum Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium pada Tindak Pidana Cukai Razes Ronal Pasaribu; Fristia Berdian Tamza; Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah; Maudina Hutagalung
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.4688

Abstract

This study will analyze whether the application of the legal principle of ultimum remedium in resolving excise crimes has fulfilled the objectives of the law. According to Gustav Radbruch, "the legal purpose of law is to realize a sense of justice, legal certainty, and benefit". The results of the analysis indicate that the application of ultimum remedium has fulfilled some of the objectives of the law, namely achieving benefit and legal certainty. However, this principle has not fully fulfilled the sense of justice, so improvements are needed in its implementing regulations.
Perlindungan Hak Privasi Tersangka Dalam Upaya Paksa Penggeledahan Data Digital Menurut Proyeksi KUHAP 2025 M. Ghiffari Andrista; Ahmad Irzal Ferdiansyah; Agus Triono; Erna Dewi; Fristia Berdian Tamza
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.5415

Abstract

Transformasi pembuktian ke arah digital menimbulkan kerentanan baru terhadap pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, khususnya hak privasi tersangka akibat praktik fishing expedition (ekspedisi memancing) dalam penggeledahan gawai di bawah rezim KUHAP 1981. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji filosofi pelindungan hak privasi dan menganalisis implikasi normatif Bab VI khususnya Pasal 142 Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara filosofis, pelindungan privasi dalam upaya paksa penggeledahan digital bertumpu pada prinsip due process of law, asas proporsionalitas, dan asas subsidiaritas, di mana ruang digital diakui sebagai ekstensi martabat manusia yang tidak boleh diinvasi secara sewenang-wenang oleh negara. Secara normatif, proyeksi Pasal 142 KUHAP 2025 merekonstruksi kewenangan penegak hukum melalui keharusan izin dari Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan (HPP) sebagai bentuk judicial scrutiny. Regulasi ini secara tegas mewajibkan penerapan metode ekstraksi tertarget (targeted extraction), melarang eksploitasi data pribadi yang tidak relevan dengan pokok perkara, dan mensyaratkan adopsi exclusionary rule yang menggugurkan kekuatan pembuktian bagi bukti elektronik yang diperoleh secara melawan hukum (unlawfully obtained evidence).
Co-Authors Agus Triono Ahmad Irzal Ferdiansyah Armanda Armanda Erna Dewi Fardiansyah, Ahmad Irzal M. Ghiffari Andrista Maudina Hutagalung Razes Ronal Pasaribu