Rena Zulfaidah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Hak atas Lingkungan Hidup yang Baik dalam Kasus Pencemaran Lintas Batas: Telaah terhadap Prinsip Kedaulatan Negara Rena Zulfaidah; Utang Rosidin
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1748

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional review of the right to a good and healthy environment as guaranteed under Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia in the context of transboundary environmental pollution, with a focus on the interpretation of state sovereignty. Transboundary pollution raises serious legal challenges due to the limitations of national jurisdiction in protecting citizens’ constitutional rights from environmental harm originating outside state territory. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches by analyzing the 1945 Constitution, environmental legislation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The findings indicate that a narrow and territorial interpretation of state sovereignty may undermine the effective protection of environmental rights. Therefore, the Constitutional Court is encouraged to adopt a progressive constitutional interpretation that reconceptualizes sovereignty as a protective constitutional obligation (state obligation) encompassing transnational dimensions, in order to ensure the effective fulfillment of citizens’ environmental rights.
Law Under the Shadow of Power: Exploration of the Politicization of Law and Its Impact on Legal Quality and Law Enforcement in Indonesia Rena Zulfaidah; Muhammad Torieq Abdillah
Pancasila and Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v6i2.4795

Abstract

The principle of the rule of law (rechtsstaat) positions law as the primary safeguard of justice and democracy. In Indonesian constitutional practice, however, law often operates under political influence through legal politicization. This occurs when legal instruments are used to advance political interests in legislation, adjudication, and enforcement. Such practices undermine institutional independence, weaken enforcement quality, and erode public trust. This study examines the forms, mechanisms, and impacts of legal politicization on law and enforcement in post Reformasi Indonesia. It employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, drawing on Critical Legal Studies (CLS) and analysis of statutes, court decisions, and relevant cases. The findings show that legal politicization in Indonesia is systemic and structural, reflected in agenda driven legislation, judicial intervention, the weakening of independent institutions, and selective enforcement. These patterns weaken the rechtsstaat and checks and balances while accelerating democratic decline through elite impunity and shrinking civic space. Legal politicization therefore poses a serious threat to constitutional democracy in Indonesia.
The Legacy of Colonial Legal Politics on Islamic Law and Indonesian Adat Law: An Analysis of Snouck Hurgronje’s Thought Sulaiman Kurdi; Ichwan Ahnaz Alamudi; Muhammad Torieq Abdillah; Husna Sari; Rena Zulfaidah
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v4i2.812

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the political legacy of Dutch colonial law on Islamic law and adat law in Indonesia through a study of Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje’s thoughts. Different from previous studies that generally address colonial policy history, modern legislative convergence, or pre-colonial history in isolation, this study reconstructs Hurgronje’s receptie theory as a systematic instrument of legal engineering. This normative legal research employs historical and conceptual approaches by analyzing primary colonial documents as well as contemporary literature. The results demonstrate that prior to colonial intervention, Islamic law operated as an autonomous and sovereign legal system alongside customary law. Driven by Hurgronje’s doctrine that separated ritual Islam from political Islam, colonial policy systematically subordinated Islamic law to customary law (adatrechtpolitiek) through processes of dehistoricization and institutional marginalization. The findings affirm that this colonial legal engineering transformed an authentic and egalitarian pre-colonial legal pluralism into a hegemonical and segregative post-colonial legal system. Therefore, this study underscores the importance of deconstructing colonial epistemic biases to establish a fair and equal framework for national legal pluralism in Indonesia.