Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Priviet Social Sciences Journal Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Law Research Review Quarterly
Feby Reski Utami
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Korban dalam Kerangka Keadilan Restoratif pada Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Auliah Ambarwati
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i1.895

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis perlindungan korban dalam perspektif keadilan restoratif serta posisinya dalam pembaharuan sistem hukum nasional indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keadilan restoratif menempatkan korban sebagai subjek hukum yang berhak atas pemulihan melalui partisipasi aktif dalam proses penyelesaian perkara pidana. Pembaharuan melalui undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang kuhp dan undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2025 tentang kuhap mencerminkan pergeseran dari pendekatan retributif menuju restoratif yang lebih berorientasi pada pemulihan korban. Namun, pengaturannya masih bersifat normatif dan belum sepenuhnya operasional, sehingga perlindungan korban belum optimal. Diperlukan penguatan regulasi yang lebih konkret untuk menjamin pemenuhan hak korban secara efektif.
Admissibility of digital evidence in Indonesia: Criminal–civil implications for the chain of custody and evidentiary validity Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Auliah Ambarwati; Feby Reski Utami
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i4.1566

Abstract

Digital evidence has become a cornerstone of modern litigation in Indonesia; however, its admissibility remains complex because of the varying standards of proof across legal regimes. This study analyzes the construction of digital evidence admissibility following the enactment of Law No. 20 of 2025 (The New Criminal Procedure Code) and its harmonization with Law No. 11 of 2008 (UU ITE). Methodologically, this research employs a doctrinal legal analysis with a conceptual and statutory approach, utilizing court judgments as doctrinal illustrations to identify judicial inconsistencies in handling electronic data. The findings reveal that while Article 177 paragraph (1) letter f of Law No. 20/2025 now explicitly recognizes electronic information as independent evidence, its validity is strictly contingent upon Chain of Custody (CoC) compliance. In criminal proceedings, CoC lapses, such as failure in hashing or unauthorized access, frequently lead to the exclusion of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Conversely, in civil cases, procedural defects typically result in a reduction in probative value rather than total inadmissibility, governed by the principle of functional equivalence. To mitigate judicial disparity, this study proposes a Criminal–Civil Admissibility Matrix and a Minimum CoC Checklist comprising five technical indicators: lawful acquisition, hashing, forensic imaging, documented transfer, and expert certification. These frameworks serve as normative guides to ensure the integrity, authenticity, and reliability of digital proof in the Indonesian judiciary.
Judicial Pardon Implementation under The  2023 Indonesian Criminal Code: Regulatory Analysis and Juridical Implications Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; M. Reyhan Aldabena
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.57773

Abstract

The enactment of the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023) introduces a significant reform to Indonesia's sentencing system by explicitly regulating of Judicial Pardon. This concept empowers judges to refrain from imposing a criminal penalty or measure on a defendant proven guilty of a criminal act, based on considerations of justice and humanity. This study aims to conduct a constructive legal analysis of Judicial Pardon within the new Criminal Code, examining the limits of judicial discretion in its application and the legal implications for harmonizing legal certainty with substantive justice. The study employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and literature review approaches. The findings indicate that the explicit inclusion of Judicial Pardon in the new Criminal Code represents a paradigm shift from formal legalism toward substantive justice, achieved through the application of principles such as the individualization of sentencing and restorative justice. However, the lack of clear normative parameters in Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Code creates a potential risk of sentencing disparities, the abuse of judicial discretion, and compromised legal certainty. Therefore, clear boundaries are required, grounded in the principles of proportionality and propriety, as well as the harmonization of the Criminal Code with the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law on Judicial Power to ensure that Judicial Pardon functions as an instrument of substantive justice without undermining legal certainty or judicial accountability.
Eksploitasi Siber dan Pertanggungjawaban Negara di Asia Tenggara: Tinjauan Viktimologis dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Shaifullah Shaifullah
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 4, No 1 (2026): Published 06-06-2026
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v4i1.40558

Abstract

The practice of online scams in Cambodia has evolved into cyber slavery, involving human trafficking and forced labor. This study aims to analyze this phenomenon through a victimological perspective and examine state responsibility under international law. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, case study, comparative law, and victimological approaches, this research evaluates relevant international instruments. Findings indicate that scam compound operations fulfill the elements of trafficking and forced labor, causing primary, secondary, and moral injury to victims due to the weak application of the non-punishment principle. Legally, the state has failed to fulfill its due diligence obligations and the 4P framework. This study recommends strengthening regional legal harmonization, establishing an ASEAN rapid response mechanism, and adopting a victim-centered justice approach, as implemented in the UK's Modern Slavery Act, to enforce state responsibility in eradicating cyber slavery in Southeast Asia.
Co-Authors Auliah Ambarwati Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko M. Reyhan Aldabena Shaifullah Shaifullah