Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Law Research Review Quarterly
M. Reyhan Aldabena
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dissenting opinion Hakim Terhadap Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Perkara Wanprestasi Perjanjian Pembagian Harta Bersama Reza Kautsar Kusumahpraja; M. Reyhan Aldabena; Auliah Ambarwati
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i1.677

Abstract

Negara membagi kekuasaan menjadi tiga, yaitu eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif. Di Indonesia, kekuasaan yudikatif dijalankan oleh Mahkamah Agung beserta badan peradilan di bawahnya, yaitu Peradilan Umum, Agama, Tata Usaha Negara, dan Militer, yang masing-masing memiliki kompetensi absolut. Dalam Putusan Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Msh terdapat dissenting opinion terkait gugatan wanprestasi pembagian harta bersama pasca perceraian. Mayoritas hakim menyatakan gugatan tidak dapat diterima, sedangkan hakim dissenting berpendapat Pengadilan Negeri Masohi berwenang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual, serta dianalisis secara kualitatif deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dissenting opinion diatur dalam Pasal 14 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009. Putusan yang menyatakan gugatan tidak dapat diterima dinilai keliru, sehingga diperlukan pengaturan teknis mengenai dissenting opinion.
Judicial Pardon Implementation under The  2023 Indonesian Criminal Code: Regulatory Analysis and Juridical Implications Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; M. Reyhan Aldabena
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.57773

Abstract

The enactment of the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023) introduces a significant reform to Indonesia's sentencing system by explicitly regulating of Judicial Pardon. This concept empowers judges to refrain from imposing a criminal penalty or measure on a defendant proven guilty of a criminal act, based on considerations of justice and humanity. This study aims to conduct a constructive legal analysis of Judicial Pardon within the new Criminal Code, examining the limits of judicial discretion in its application and the legal implications for harmonizing legal certainty with substantive justice. The study employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and literature review approaches. The findings indicate that the explicit inclusion of Judicial Pardon in the new Criminal Code represents a paradigm shift from formal legalism toward substantive justice, achieved through the application of principles such as the individualization of sentencing and restorative justice. However, the lack of clear normative parameters in Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Code creates a potential risk of sentencing disparities, the abuse of judicial discretion, and compromised legal certainty. Therefore, clear boundaries are required, grounded in the principles of proportionality and propriety, as well as the harmonization of the Criminal Code with the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law on Judicial Power to ensure that Judicial Pardon functions as an instrument of substantive justice without undermining legal certainty or judicial accountability.
Co-Authors Auliah Ambarwati Feby Reski Utami Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko Reza Kautsar Kusumahpraja