Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Priviet Social Sciences Journal Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Law Research Review Quarterly
Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Korban dalam Kerangka Keadilan Restoratif pada Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Auliah Ambarwati
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i1.895

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis perlindungan korban dalam perspektif keadilan restoratif serta posisinya dalam pembaharuan sistem hukum nasional indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keadilan restoratif menempatkan korban sebagai subjek hukum yang berhak atas pemulihan melalui partisipasi aktif dalam proses penyelesaian perkara pidana. Pembaharuan melalui undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang kuhp dan undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2025 tentang kuhap mencerminkan pergeseran dari pendekatan retributif menuju restoratif yang lebih berorientasi pada pemulihan korban. Namun, pengaturannya masih bersifat normatif dan belum sepenuhnya operasional, sehingga perlindungan korban belum optimal. Diperlukan penguatan regulasi yang lebih konkret untuk menjamin pemenuhan hak korban secara efektif.
CORRUPTION AS AN EXTRAORDINARY CRIME: EVALUATING THE RULE OF LAW, DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS Muhyi Mohas; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Reine Rofiana; Arie Kartika; Muh Farhan Arfandy
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21736655

Abstract

Corruption categorized as an extraordinary crime continues to show a significant upward trend in Indonesia. As a product of the 1998 reform movement, efforts to realize a clean government were institutionalized through Law Number 28 of 1999. However, empirical realities show a structural anomaly where democratic instruments are hijacked by old power structures acting as free riders to perpetuate authoritarian tendencies. This systemic failure degrades the rule of law and forces a critical re-examination of how political transitions accommodate oligarchic resilience. Consequently, this study addresses how corruption undergoes structural metamorphosis, how state capture interacts with democratic procedures, and to what extent it deprives citizens of constitutional protections. Research Method, using a combined legal research method (normative-empirical jurisprudence) with a qualitative-descriptive approach, this study dissects State Capture Corruption through Olle Törnquist’s "shadowy democracy" thesis and Nils Bubandt's oxymoronic democracy corruption framework. Research Outcome: The results confirm that local oligarchies distort political transitions through the capitalization of authority and Sophistic truth manipulation. This paradox turns democracy into an incubator for systemic corruption, where public funds are diverted, leaving the public as a collective victim. The novelty lies in integrating Samuel Huntington’s transition models to reveal a "transformation from above" using fresh data. Theoretically, it enriches progressive criminal jurisprudence, while practically providing strategic policy recommendations for anti corruption authorities to shield public budgets from oligarchic interventions.
Admissibility of digital evidence in Indonesia: Criminal–civil implications for the chain of custody and evidentiary validity Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Auliah Ambarwati; Feby Reski Utami
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i4.1566

Abstract

Digital evidence has become a cornerstone of modern litigation in Indonesia; however, its admissibility remains complex because of the varying standards of proof across legal regimes. This study analyzes the construction of digital evidence admissibility following the enactment of Law No. 20 of 2025 (The New Criminal Procedure Code) and its harmonization with Law No. 11 of 2008 (UU ITE). Methodologically, this research employs a doctrinal legal analysis with a conceptual and statutory approach, utilizing court judgments as doctrinal illustrations to identify judicial inconsistencies in handling electronic data. The findings reveal that while Article 177 paragraph (1) letter f of Law No. 20/2025 now explicitly recognizes electronic information as independent evidence, its validity is strictly contingent upon Chain of Custody (CoC) compliance. In criminal proceedings, CoC lapses, such as failure in hashing or unauthorized access, frequently lead to the exclusion of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Conversely, in civil cases, procedural defects typically result in a reduction in probative value rather than total inadmissibility, governed by the principle of functional equivalence. To mitigate judicial disparity, this study proposes a Criminal–Civil Admissibility Matrix and a Minimum CoC Checklist comprising five technical indicators: lawful acquisition, hashing, forensic imaging, documented transfer, and expert certification. These frameworks serve as normative guides to ensure the integrity, authenticity, and reliability of digital proof in the Indonesian judiciary.
Judicial Pardon Implementation under The  2023 Indonesian Criminal Code: Regulatory Analysis and Juridical Implications Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; M. Reyhan Aldabena
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.57773

Abstract

The enactment of the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023) introduces a significant reform to Indonesia's sentencing system by explicitly regulating of Judicial Pardon. This concept empowers judges to refrain from imposing a criminal penalty or measure on a defendant proven guilty of a criminal act, based on considerations of justice and humanity. This study aims to conduct a constructive legal analysis of Judicial Pardon within the new Criminal Code, examining the limits of judicial discretion in its application and the legal implications for harmonizing legal certainty with substantive justice. The study employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and literature review approaches. The findings indicate that the explicit inclusion of Judicial Pardon in the new Criminal Code represents a paradigm shift from formal legalism toward substantive justice, achieved through the application of principles such as the individualization of sentencing and restorative justice. However, the lack of clear normative parameters in Article 54 paragraph (2) of the Code creates a potential risk of sentencing disparities, the abuse of judicial discretion, and compromised legal certainty. Therefore, clear boundaries are required, grounded in the principles of proportionality and propriety, as well as the harmonization of the Criminal Code with the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law on Judicial Power to ensure that Judicial Pardon functions as an instrument of substantive justice without undermining legal certainty or judicial accountability.
Eksploitasi Siber dan Pertanggungjawaban Negara di Asia Tenggara: Tinjauan Viktimologis dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Feby Reski Utami; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Shaifullah Shaifullah
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 4, No 1 (2026): Published 06-06-2026
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v4i1.40558

Abstract

The practice of online scams in Cambodia has evolved into cyber slavery, involving human trafficking and forced labor. This study aims to analyze this phenomenon through a victimological perspective and examine state responsibility under international law. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, case study, comparative law, and victimological approaches, this research evaluates relevant international instruments. Findings indicate that scam compound operations fulfill the elements of trafficking and forced labor, causing primary, secondary, and moral injury to victims due to the weak application of the non-punishment principle. Legally, the state has failed to fulfill its due diligence obligations and the 4P framework. This study recommends strengthening regional legal harmonization, establishing an ASEAN rapid response mechanism, and adopting a victim-centered justice approach, as implemented in the UK's Modern Slavery Act, to enforce state responsibility in eradicating cyber slavery in Southeast Asia.
BUREAUCRATIC PATHOLOGIES AND EXECUTIVE DEFIANCE IN COASTAL MINING CONCESSIONS: A POLITICAL AND CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVE Alwi Al Hadad; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Shaifullah
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Vol 19 No 1 (2026): Volume 19 Nomor 1: Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jppdp.v19i1.6389

Abstract

The centralization of electronic mining licensing in Indonesia has given rise to bureaucratic pathologies in the form of sectoral egos that undermine local autonomy and threaten the sustainability of coastal ecosystems. This study aims to deconstruct legal anomalies and political dynamics in governance regarding the issuance of mining operation permits on small islands, analyze the impasse in litigation practices, and formulate a framework for resolving the dysfunction in the execution of administrative court rulings (PTUN). Through a normative legal research method employing legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches to Supreme Court Decision No. 650 K/TUN/2022, this study identifies three structural flaws. First, the central government’s erroneous application of the lex specialis doctrine has prioritized the mining exploitation regime over imperative instruments for the protection of coastal ecosystems. Second, the absence of enforceable executive instruments within the PTUN procedural law triggers institutional defiance, where decisions to revoke permits become ineffective and merely create an illusion of environmental justice. Third, this systemic weakness is exploited by administrative officials through the manipulation of issuing new disputed objects (permit recycling) to circumvent the court’s ruling. As a solution, this paper recommends a paradigm shift from formal-procedural oversight toward outcome-based governance evaluation. This must be accompanied by the absolute blocking of an integrated geospatial data-based permitting system, as well as the imposition of dwangsom (compulsory fines) directly levied on the personal assets of state officials and the integration of criminal law enforcement against defiant bureaucrats to break the chain of administrative law circumvention. Keywords: Bureaucratic Pathologies; Executive Defiance; Licensing Centralization; Political Dynamics; Criminal Liability.
Co-Authors Alwi Al Hadad Arie Kartika Auliah Ambarwati Feby Reski Utami M. Reyhan Aldabena Muh Farhan Arfandy Muhyi Mohas Reine Rofiana Shaifullah Shaifullah Shaifullah