Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Nekrofilia sebagai Kejahatan Kesusilaan: Telaah Yuridis dan Perbandingan Hukum Fathimah Azzahra; Rocmad Dwi Riwayanto
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/qmbrt197

Abstract

Nekrofilia merupakan bentuk penyimpangan seksual yang menimbulkan persoalan hukum karena belum diatur secara tegas dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaturan nekrofilia dalam KUHP lama dan KUHP baru serta membandingkannya dengan sistem hukum Belanda. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi literatur. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa nekrofilia tidak dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai tindak pidana pemerkosaan karena tidak terpenuhinya unsur kekerasan dan persetujuan dari korban yang telah meninggal dunia. Sementara itu, Belanda melalui hasil penelitian WODC tahun 2022 menilai bahwa nekrofilia merupakan pelanggaran serius terhadap martabat manusia yang memerlukan pengaturan tersendiri. Kesimpulannya, Indonesia perlu membentuk delik khusus yang menempatkan nekrofilia sebagai kejahatan kesusilaan tersendiri dengan ancaman pidana yang lebih tegas guna melindungi martabat manusia bahkan setelah kematian.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE AS THE BASIS FOR CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN FOREST ENCROACHMENT CRIMES Rocmad Dwi Riwayanto; Muklis Al'anam
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v16i1.48489

Abstract

Deforestation by corporations is a serious environmental crime and has a significant impact on ecosystem damage and sustainable development. The objectives of this study are to: (1) analyze the application of the Polluter Pays Principle in corporate criminal liability for forest encroachment, and (2) identify normative and implementation weaknesses in enforcing this principle in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by an analysis of law enforcement practices. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of PPPs in cases of forest encroachment is still limited to administrative and civil sanctions, while its utilization in the criminal justice system is not optimal. Three main problems found are: (1) the absence of a standard for assessing ecological losses that can be used to impose fines; (2) weak evidence of corporate interaction due to the complexity of organizational structures and the use of corporations; and (3) the lack of synchronization between the regulations of the Environmental Law and the Forestry Law in determining the form of criminal liability. The uniqueness of this study lies in the integration of the Polluter Pays Principle into a framework of corporate criminal liability based on a multi-doctrine approach (identification theory, indirect liability, and corporate culture theory) as a model for more effective law enforcement. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate environmental criminal policy to emphasize the optimization of fines, ecological restoration, and systematic enforcement of corporate responsibility, so that the PPP principle can be implemented effectively and provide a deterrent effect. Keywords: Corporate Criminal Liability, Forest Encroachment, Polluter Pays Principle