Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Evidence Of Law PESHUM Jurnal Sipakatau
Adnan Hamid
Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Nursing Physics Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Kode Etik Notaris Terkait Larangan Kemitraan dengan Biro Jasa dalam Mencari Klien Ihramsyah Anuddin; Adnan Hamid; Zaitun Abdullah
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16355

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kesenjangan implementasi Kode Etik Notaris terkait larangan kemitraan dengan biro jasa dalam mencari klien, yang mengancam independensi profesi di era digital. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis penerapan normatif, faktor pendorong pelanggaran, dampak yuridis-etis, serta merumuskan rekomendasi penguatan pengawasan. Jenis penelitian hukum normatif kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Populasi meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, Kode Etik INI, dan doktrin hukum; sampel purposif mencakup Pasal 4 ayat (4) Kode Etik INI 2015, UUJN, serta literatur terkait. Instrumen berupa studi kepustakaan, dianalisis deskriptif-analitis dengan content analysis. Hasil menunjukkan praktik bundling digital dan referral fee marak akibat distribusi notaris tidak merata dan pengawasan reaktif MPD. Kesimpulan merekomendasikan gradasi sanksi, amendemen kode etik, audit SIDNot, dan pelatihan etika wajib untuk penurunan pelanggaran 50% dalam tiga tahun.
Implementation of Forest Area Regulation and Environmental Justice Challenges in Indonesia under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 Agus Surono; Sadino Sadino; Zaitun Abdullah; Agung Iriantoro; Adnan Hamid; Maslihati Nur Hidayati
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i1.603

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s forest governance continues to face challenges such as overlapping land claims, agrarian conflicts, and institutional fragmentation. Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 establishes a cross-sectoral Forest Area Order and Enforcement Task Force (PKH Task Force) to accelerate forest recovery and improve legal certainty. However, concerns remain regarding data reliability and social justice in its implementation. Objective: This study examines the implementation of forest area regulation under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025, focusing on governance effectiveness, socio-ecological impacts, and the relationship between enforcement mechanisms and environmental justice. Methods: A qualitative socio-legal approach was employed, combining normative juridical analysis, focus group discussions, field observations, and comparative policy review. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis and cross-case comparison. Results: Findings show that the PKH Task Force recovered approximately 3.3 million hectares of forest land by September 2025. Despite this achievement, structural issues persist, including inconsistent spatial data, overlapping customary land claims (17.6–24.4 million hectares), and unequal enforcement between large-scale actors and smallholders. Limited community participation has contributed to ongoing socio-ecological tensions. In contrast, participatory schemes such as PPTPKH/TORA (3.04 million hectares) and social forestry programs (4.1 million hectares involving over 800,000 households) indicate more inclusive governance outcomes. Conclusion: Forest governance reform demonstrates strong administrative performance but limited social legitimacy. Effective implementation requires integrating distributive, procedural, and restorative justice principles supported by participatory and integrated data governance systems. Limitations: The study is based on secondary data and selected qualitative cases, which may not fully represent regional variations in Indonesia
Protection of Advocates Immunity Rights in The Criminal Code: Between Legal Certainty and Justice Anderson Subri; Adnan Hamid; Supaphorn Akkapin
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1599

Abstract

The protection of advocates’ immunity rights is a fundamental aspect of ensuring their role as independent and equal law enforcers within the criminal justice system. In Indonesia, advocate immunity is regulated under Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates and was further interpreted by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-IX/2013 to extend beyond courtroom proceedings. However, the emergence of the Criminal Code (KUHP) raises new debates regarding the explicit recognition and operational guarantees of such rights. This study aims to analyze the normative position of advocate immunity in the KUHP and assess its implications for legal certainty and the pursuit of justice. Employing a normative legal approach and comparative analysis with other legal systems, the research finds that the current lack of clear and explicit provisions protecting advocates’ immunity in the KUHP is a notable deficiency. This legal gap may weaken the position of advocates and expose them to risks of criminalization in the performance of their professional duties. Therefore, this paper recommends a clearer normative formulation that ensures adequate protection for advocates while upholding a balanced realization of legal certainty and substantive justice in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Law EnforcementAgainst Dangerous Pharmaceutical Preparations in the National Health System Dian Puspito Rini; Adnan Hamid; Pattharawadee Rangsimanop
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1607

Abstract

Cosmetic preparations are ingredients that can be used on parts of the body that change a person's appearance. In Indonesia, the discovery of dangerous cosmetic preparations is rampant, based on several Press Releases submitted by the POM Agency. The rise of the discovery of dangerous cosmetic preparations has had a great impact on the health system in Indonesia. The a need for law enforcement against dangerous cosmetic preparations to improve the health system in Indonesia and to achieve the highest degree of health for the community. The purpose of research is to dig up and find a fact that has not existed before. The method used is qualitative literature research. The results of the surveillance research on cosmetic preparations still face obstacles due to limited human resources, large surveillance areas, and the complexity of supervision. The results of the study are the punishments given to business actors who commit cosmetic crimes, with the punishment imposed on the perpetrators being relatively light, so that they do not cause a deterrent effect for business actors. Law enforcement against dangerous cosmetic preparations in Indonesia has not had a deterrent effect on business actors and does not cause fear of committing violations, so that it can be said that it has not been able to realize the highest optimal level of public health.
The Transformation of State-Owned Enterprise Monopolies and Healthy Market Competition in Bulding Harmonization of Business Competition Law Budi Joyo Santoso; Adnan Hamid; Sineenart Suasoongnern
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1608

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution, Article 33(2), establishes the state as the controller of important branches of production for the welfare of the people, but its implementation has continued to shift in line with political regime dynamics, from the command economy model of independence to the corporatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) under the New Order and the post-1998 crisis reforms that emphasized healthy competition. The latest debate has emerged from Law No. 1/2025 on SOEs, which grants the President discretionary monopoly powers through Government Regulations without competition impact assessments by the Competition Commission (KPPU), while Law No. 5/1999 requires SOE monopolies to be regulated by law and supervised by the KPPU. The main issue is the normative disharmony between executive monopoly rights and independent oversight mechanisms, which creates legal uncertainty, potential inefficiency, and rent-seeking risks. This study employs a normative-analytical legal approach with literature review and analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal documents, integrating the statute approach and conceptual approach to unravel the relationship between the constitutional framework, monopoly policy, and the principle of fair competition. The findings indicate that Article 86M of Law 1/2025 expands executive discretion without adequate checks and balances, while Law 5/1999 provides a strict oversight framework through the KPPU. The discussion emphasizes the urgency of regulatory harmonization through systematic revision of Article 86M, including mandatory consultation with the KPPU, a sunset clause, and a competition impact assessment, as well as strengthening the independence and advisory role of the KPPU. The implementation of Good Corporate Governance, objective criteria for “national interest,” and periodic evaluation mechanisms will ensure that state-owned enterprise monopolies function in accordance with the objectives of the welfare state without undermining the competitive environment. A phased implementation model over 10 years recommends normative, institutional, operational, and democratic arrangements to achieve a balance between state intervention and sustainable market mechanisms.
Co-Authors Agung Iriantoro Agus Surono Anderson Subri Budi Joyo Santoso Dian Puspito Rini Ihramsyah Anuddin Maslihati Nur Hidayati Pattharawadee Rangsimanop Sadino Sadino Sineenart Suasoongnern Supaphorn Akkapin Zaitun Abdullah