Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Kode Etik Notaris Terkait Larangan Kemitraan dengan Biro Jasa dalam Mencari Klien Ihramsyah Anuddin; Adnan Hamid; Zaitun Abdullah
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16355

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kesenjangan implementasi Kode Etik Notaris terkait larangan kemitraan dengan biro jasa dalam mencari klien, yang mengancam independensi profesi di era digital. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis penerapan normatif, faktor pendorong pelanggaran, dampak yuridis-etis, serta merumuskan rekomendasi penguatan pengawasan. Jenis penelitian hukum normatif kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Populasi meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, Kode Etik INI, dan doktrin hukum; sampel purposif mencakup Pasal 4 ayat (4) Kode Etik INI 2015, UUJN, serta literatur terkait. Instrumen berupa studi kepustakaan, dianalisis deskriptif-analitis dengan content analysis. Hasil menunjukkan praktik bundling digital dan referral fee marak akibat distribusi notaris tidak merata dan pengawasan reaktif MPD. Kesimpulan merekomendasikan gradasi sanksi, amendemen kode etik, audit SIDNot, dan pelatihan etika wajib untuk penurunan pelanggaran 50% dalam tiga tahun.
Implementation of Forest Area Regulation and Environmental Justice Challenges in Indonesia under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 Agus Surono; Sadino Sadino; Zaitun Abdullah; Agung Iriantoro; Adnan Hamid; Maslihati Nur Hidayati
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i1.603

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s forest governance continues to face challenges such as overlapping land claims, agrarian conflicts, and institutional fragmentation. Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 establishes a cross-sectoral Forest Area Order and Enforcement Task Force (PKH Task Force) to accelerate forest recovery and improve legal certainty. However, concerns remain regarding data reliability and social justice in its implementation. Objective: This study examines the implementation of forest area regulation under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025, focusing on governance effectiveness, socio-ecological impacts, and the relationship between enforcement mechanisms and environmental justice. Methods: A qualitative socio-legal approach was employed, combining normative juridical analysis, focus group discussions, field observations, and comparative policy review. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis and cross-case comparison. Results: Findings show that the PKH Task Force recovered approximately 3.3 million hectares of forest land by September 2025. Despite this achievement, structural issues persist, including inconsistent spatial data, overlapping customary land claims (17.6–24.4 million hectares), and unequal enforcement between large-scale actors and smallholders. Limited community participation has contributed to ongoing socio-ecological tensions. In contrast, participatory schemes such as PPTPKH/TORA (3.04 million hectares) and social forestry programs (4.1 million hectares involving over 800,000 households) indicate more inclusive governance outcomes. Conclusion: Forest governance reform demonstrates strong administrative performance but limited social legitimacy. Effective implementation requires integrating distributive, procedural, and restorative justice principles supported by participatory and integrated data governance systems. Limitations: The study is based on secondary data and selected qualitative cases, which may not fully represent regional variations in Indonesia