Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Journal of Social Movements
Rizqi Nur Afifah
Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PROGRAM EVALUATION OF MUADALAH MUALLIMIN PESANTREN USING COUNTENANCE MODEL Fawzul Arifin; Rizqi Nur Afifah; Syafa'at Ariful Huda
Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Regular Issue (In Progress)
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jmp.v11i1.1683

Abstract

Pesantren have received state recognition, institutional strengthening, and equal rights in the implementation of educational activities through Law No. 18 of 2019 on Pesantren. Among the forms of pesantren officially recognized are pesantren muadalah operating under the salafiyah and muallimin systems; however, empirical evaluation studies on the implementation of the muadalah muallimin pesantren program remain limited. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of program implementation and to examine the application of an evaluation model in order to develop a systematic, contextual, and applicable evaluation framework that may serve as a reference for muadalah muallimin pesantren in Indonesia. This research employed a qualitative approach using a case study method and the Stake’s Countenance Evaluation Model. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The evaluation criteria were based on government regulations concerning quality standards for pesantren education within muadalah muallimin educational units. The findings indicate that the implementation of the muadalah program achieved an excellent classification, attaining an A grade with a final score of 91. The component scores were as follows: curriculum 97.27, students 97.36, educators and educational staff 94.08, facilities and infrastructure 90.67, financing 100, institutional management 93.08, teaching and learning processes 91.27, and learning outcomes and graduates 61.75. This study contributes novel insights to the body of knowledge on program evaluation of muadalah muallimin pesantren.
PROGRAM EVALUATION OF MUADALAH MUALLIMIN PESANTREN USING COUNTENANCE MODEL Fawzul Arifin; Rizqi Nur Afifah; Syafa'at Ariful Huda
Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Regular Issue
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jmp.v11i1.1683

Abstract

Pesantren have received state recognition, institutional strengthening, and equal rights in the implementation of educational activities through Law No. 18 of 2019 on Pesantren. Among the forms of pesantren officially recognized are pesantren muadalah operating under the salafiyah and muallimin systems; however, empirical evaluation studies on the implementation of the muadalah muallimin pesantren program remain limited. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of program implementation and to examine the application of an evaluation model in order to develop a systematic, contextual, and applicable evaluation framework that may serve as a reference for muadalah muallimin pesantren in Indonesia. This research employed a qualitative approach using a case study method and the Stake’s Countenance Evaluation Model. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The evaluation criteria were based on government regulations concerning quality standards for pesantren education within muadalah muallimin educational units. The findings indicate that the implementation of the muadalah program achieved an excellent classification, attaining an A grade with a final score of 91. The component scores were as follows: curriculum 97.27, students 97.36, educators and educational staff 94.08, facilities and infrastructure 90.67, financing 100, institutional management 93.08, teaching and learning processes 91.27, and learning outcomes and graduates 61.75. This study contributes novel insights to the body of knowledge on program evaluation of muadalah muallimin pesantren.
Bootcamps for Work Competency Development: A Cross-Domain Scoping Review through an Educational Management Lens Lina Lina; Rizqi Nur Afifah; Iqbal Faza Ahmad
Journal of Social Movements Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Sahabat Akademia Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/jsm.v3i2.2026.132

Abstract

Intensive bootcamp programmes are used in medical, technological and academic training, yet evidence about them is scattered across domain-specific literature. This review maps how bootcamps are defined, for whom and why they are used, how they are designed and what outcomes are reported, and interprets these patterns through an educational management lens. A scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and JBI guidance, reported according to PRISMA-ScR. Scopus was searched once, through the Watase application, on 7 February 2024 (titles, abstracts and keywords; English-language journal articles, 2019 to early 2024); reliance on this single database is a key limitation. After screening and re-application of clarified eligibility criteria, 61 studies were charted and analysed through descriptive numerical summary and thematic synthesis, with management implications labelled as interpretive. Health professions education dominated the corpus (42 of 61 studies, 68.9%), and most bootcamps were embedded in formal education or training pathways (48, 78.7%); only four studies examined bootcamps as alternatives to formal education. Forty studies (65.6%) targeted participants at a role transition. Hands-on practice or simulation was the most frequently reported design feature (41, 67.2%). Evidence came mainly from single-group pre-post and descriptive studies; eight studies used a comparison group and 11 measured behaviour or results, with mixed findings. The review makes two distinct contributions: a cross-domain map of bootcamp provision that earlier single-specialty reviews do not provide, and an operationalised educational management reading (purposes, people and resources, processes, and institutional context) that frames bootcamps as transition-focused programmes whose evaluation remains underdeveloped. Implications for Indonesia are presented as policy options that require local evidence.
Co-Authors Fawzul Arifin Fawzul Arifin Iqbal Faza Ahmad Lina Lina Syafa'at Ariful Huda Syafa'at Ariful Huda