Saifudin Amin
Muhammadiyah Islamic College (MIC)

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Institutional Authority Reconstruction in Anti-Corruption Enforcement: An Islamic Legal Approach to SDG 16 Muhammad Fadly Hasibuan; Febrian; Iza Rumesten RS; Saifudin Amin
Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 26 No. 03 (2025): Profetika Jurnal Studi Islam 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/profetika.v26i03.14362

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the authority of law enforcement agencies in handling corruption crimes in Indonesia and its relationship with efforts to realize the effectiveness of law enforcement that supports the achievement of SDG 16 on justice and transparent governance. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework of this research is based on the concept of the authority of law enforcement agencies in the eradication of corruption by examining the applicable legal basis and the idea of reconstructing the ideal law enforcement system, including the perspective of national criminal law and Islamic criminal law. Literature review: A literature review discusses the regulations governing the authority of investigation, investigation, and prosecution by law enforcement agencies in corruption cases, as well as the ideal concept of law enforcement in the eradication of corruption. Methods: This study uses a normative juridical method through a literature study of laws and regulations and legal references to analyze the insynchronization of authority between law enforcement agencies. Results: The results of the study show that there is an overlap of authority between law enforcement agencies that causes institutional conflicts, delays in handling cases, as well as potential political intervention and legal uncertainty, especially after the enactment of Law No. 19 of 2019 related to the CEC. Implications: This study emphasizes the importance of reconstructing authority through the revision of corruption eradication regulations and strengthening coordination and division of authority between law enforcement agencies so that the handling of corruption cases is more effective and synergistic. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of the imbalance of the authority of law enforcement agencies and the proposal of a model for the reconstruction of the authority of corruption law enforcement that supports the achievement of SDG 16.
Reconceptualizing CSR Grant Governance in Regional SOEs: Integrating Maqasid al-Shariah and SDG 17 Dita Kurniawati; Joni Emirzon; Putu Samawati; Saifudin Amin
Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 26 No. 03 (2025): Profetika Jurnal Studi Islam 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/profetika.v26i03.15889

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to reconceptualize grant arrangements by BUMDs in CSR programs through a beneficiality principle approach aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 17 on partnerships for sustainable development. The focus is on formulating recommendations for regulatory concepts that can be applied in the future. This goal is directed to increase legal certainty and the social impact of CSR programs. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework is based on the concept of regulating BUMD's CSR obligations based on the applicable legal basis while incorporating SDGs principles. The principle of the usefulness approach is used as the basis for the analysis of regulatory reconstruction, including the integration of the perspective of maqasid al-shari'ah and SDG 17. The framework emphasizes a balance between legal certainty, public benefit, sustainability, and collaborative governance. Literature review: The literature review covers social and environmental responsibility regulations and the concept of grants in BUMD CSR, including the need to reconstruct regulations so that they do not overlap with APBD grants, while supporting SDGs-oriented governance. Methods: The method used is normative juridical through the study of legal literature, laws, and regulations to analyze problems and formulate regulatory concepts in line with SDGs values. Results: The results show that there is no clear legal terminology for grants by BUMDs, so that it has the potential to cause inequality with APBD grants and needs to be based on the principle of sustainable utility and SDGs-oriented governance, particularly strengthening partnerships (SDG 17). Implications: This study emphasizes the importance of clear regulations to increase the accountability of BUMD CSR and ensure tangible social benefits for the community while contributing to the achievement of SDGs. Novelty: The novelty lies in the formulation of the CSR concept through BUMD grants based on the principles of usefulness, maqasid al-shari'ah, and SDGs (especially SDG 17), while still paying attention to legal certainty and sustainable development.