Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

FROM REGULATION TO LIABILITY: CHANGING DATA PRIVACY LANDSCAPE IN THE DIGITAL AGE Rengga Yudha Santoso; Yohana Rosita Dewi Mariyani
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS (INJOSER)
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid digital transformation has turned data privacy into a global strategic issue. Regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provide a comprehensive legal framework for the protection of personal data, but their effectiveness depends heavily on the ability of organizations to apply the principles of accountability and substantive responsibility. This research aims to analyze the paradigm shift from regulatory compliance (regulation-based) to organizational accountability (responsibility-based) in data privacy governance in the digital era. The approach used is qualitative with a systematic literature study method, reviewing Scopus-indexed scientific articles and the Web of Science published between 2015–2025, as well as policy reports from international institutions such as the OECD and EDPB. The analysis was carried out using thematic analysis techniques to identify the main patterns in the application of the principles of accountability, privacy by design, data protection impact assessment (DPIA), as well as social context and privacy ethics. The results show that the paradigm shift towards responsibility requires organizations not only to comply with formal regulations, but also to build an internal governance system that is able to proactively prove data protection. Mechanisms such as privacy by design and DPIA have proven effective in increasing transparency, risk mitigation, and public trust. In addition, the theory of Contextual Integrity and the Taxonomy of Privacy assert that privacy protection must consider social norms and ethical values, not just legal aspects. In the context of developing countries, including Indonesia, the implementation of privacy responsibilities still faces challenges such as limited institutional capacity, low digital literacy, and policy fragmentation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen independent supervisory institutions, increase public literacy, and integrate accountability principles in business strategies and technology design. This research confirms that the future of data protection lies in the balance between strong regulation and ethical responsibility of organizations. By internalizing the principles of accountability, organizations can build a transparent, ethical, and sustainable data ecosystem, while strengthening public trust in the digital age.
ANALISIS URGENSI PENGESAHAN RUU MASYARAKAT ADAT DALAM MENJAMIN KEPASTIAN HAK-HAK MASYARAKAT ADAT DI INDONESIA: KAJIAN PUSTAKA ATAS MANDEKNYA PROSES LEGISLASI HINGGA 2025 Rengga Yudha Santoso; Krisna Bayu Pratama
NETIZEN: JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND BUSSINESS Vol. 1 No. 9 (2025): AGUSTUS
Publisher : CV. ADIBA AISHA AMIRA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the urgency of passing the Indigenous Peoples Bill as an important instrument in guaranteeing legal certainty and protecting the rights of indigenous peoples in Indonesia, while also examining the factors that have caused the legislative process to stall until 2025. Using a library research method with a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach, data was obtained from legislation, Constitutional Court decisions, official government documents, reports from non-governmental organisations, and national and international academic literature. The study findings indicate that without a single legal framework, indigenous communities remain vulnerable to land grabs, criminalisation, and marginalisation due to overlapping sectoral regulations. The Indigenous Peoples Bill is of high urgency to integrate legal protection, policy consistency, and alignment with international commitments such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). However, the legislative process is hindered by technical obstacles in drafting the bill, political and economic interests, weak inter-agency coordination, the dominance of industry lobbying, and a lack of effective public support. This study recommends the formation of a solid advocacy coalition, increased public awareness, harmonisation of cross-sectoral regulations, and committed political leadership to accelerate the enactment of this bill for the realisation of social justice and inclusive national development.
OPTIMALISASI SUBSIDI PEMERINTAH DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEADILAN AKSES LAYANAN KESEHATAN BAGI MASYARAKAT KURANG MAMPU: TINJAUAN ATAS PROGRAM BPJS KESEHATAN 2025 Rengga Yudha Santoso; Erick Satria Pratama Wisnu Wardhana
NETIZEN: JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND BUSSINESS Vol. 1 No. 9 (2025): AGUSTUS
Publisher : CV. ADIBA AISHA AMIRA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The government subsidy programme in BPJS Kesehatan in 2025 has a strategic role in improving equitable access to health services for the poor in Indonesia. Through the Contribution Assistance Recipient (PBI) scheme, the government is trying to remove financial barriers that have been one of the main obstacles for vulnerable groups in accessing health services. However, the effectiveness of these subsidies still faces significant obstacles, such as low accuracy of beneficiary data, administrative complexity, budget constraints, health infrastructure disparities, low public health literacy, cultural barriers, weak inter-agency coordination, and limitations in information technology for data management. These obstacles not only reduce the accuracy of subsidy distribution but also affect the quality of services received by participants. Evaluations indicate that optimising subsidies cannot rely solely on expanding coverage but requires systemic reforms encompassing improved governance, strengthened infrastructure, modernised information systems, and community empowerment through comprehensive education. Adaptive policy approaches, rigorous oversight, and collaboration among stakeholders are key to delivering effective, sustainable, and targeted subsidies. With these strategic steps, it is hoped that the government's goal of achieving social justice in the health sector can be achieved, while ensuring the sustainability of BPJS Kesehatan as one of the pillars of national health insurance.
The Role of the Nganjuk KPU Election Smart House in Enhancing Students Political Literacy and Democratic Understanding RENGGA YUDHA SANTOSO; Erik Satrya Pratama Wisnu Wardana; Kri Pratama
Journal of Economics and Social Sciences (JESS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Economics and Social Sciences (JESS)
Publisher : CV. Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/jess.1405

Abstract

Democracy education in Indonesia still faces challenges in improving understanding of elections, especially among students. The Nganjuk KPU Election Smart House (RPP) is one of the efforts to overcome this problem by providing a place for democracy education for students. This study aims to evaluate the role of the Nganjuk KPU RPP in improving understanding of democracy and voter participation among students. This research method uses a qualitative approach with case studies on activities carried out at the RPP KPU Nganjuk, which involves interviews with students and direct observation of the activities that take place. The results indicate that the RPP KPU Nganjuk is effective in enhancing students understanding of democracy and elections, as evidenced by positive feedback rates of 70–85% across eight participating schools, active student engagement reflected in 12–15 questions asked per session, and interview responses indicating increased civic awareness. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including limited facilities and varying prior knowledge among students from urban and rural areas.
Peningkatan Akses Informasi Hukum untuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Masyarakat Perdesaan Catur Yunianto; Rini Marselin Kaesmetan; Rengga Yudha Santoso
SIWAYANG Journal: Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Pariwisata, Kebudayaan, dan Antropologi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/siwayang.v5i1.5283

Abstract

This study examines the improvement of access to legal information in the resolution of land disputes amongst rural communities. Land disputes in rural areas frequently arise due to the community’s limited understanding of ownership status, legal procedures and the available dispute resolution mechanisms. Limited legal literacy, a lack of public awareness campaigns, geographical distance, and the sub-optimal use of information technology are factors that exacerbate these issues. This study employs a literature review method, examining various books, journals, legislation, and relevant academic sources to identify the problems and formulate strategies for improving access to legal information. The findings indicate that ongoing legal education, the active role of village governments, the establishment of village paralegals, collaboration with legal aid organisations, and the use of digital media and social communication are effective strategies for expanding access to legal information for rural communities. With increased access to legal information, it is hoped that the community will be better able to understand their rights and obligations, prevent conflicts at an early stage, and resolve land disputes fairly, swiftly and equitably.
Dampak Kesadaran Hak Konstitusional dan Lingkungan Kerja Kondusif terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pengasuh Day Care Rengga Yudha Santoso; Ajeng Ratri Kirana Dewi; Siti Ummahatul Fitriyah; Beta Trivanka; Sri Utami Yulia Putri
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): September: Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : AMIK Veteran Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v6i3.13042

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of constitutional rights awareness and a conducive work environment on day care givers' job satisfaction. A quantitative correlational research method was employed, involving 97 day care givers selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. Validity tests showed all instrument items were valid (r-count > 0.199), and reliability tests indicated high reliability for all variables (Cronbach's Alpha > 0.892). Classical assumptions, including normality (sig. 0.200), multicollinearity (Tolerance > 0.821; VIF < 1.218), and heteroscedasticity (sig. > 0.185), were met. Regression analysis results revealed that constitutional rights awareness and a conducive work environment simultaneously had a significant impact on job satisfaction (F=30.250; p<0.001), with an R-Square of 0.616, indicating that 61.6% of the variance in job satisfaction was explained by these two variables. Partially, constitutional rights awareness (β=0.450; p<0.001) and a conducive work environment (β=0.380; p<0.001) each positively and significantly affected job satisfaction. The relative contribution of constitutional rights awareness (standardized Beta 0.435) was slightly stronger than that of a conducive work environment (standardized Beta 0.390). This study expands understanding of how the protection of fundamental rights and supportive working conditions interact to shape job satisfaction in the childcare sector, and points to the value of constitutional rights education and better work environments for caregivers' well-being.
State Power, Constitutional Legal Consciousness, and Citizen Protection in Credit Mediation by State Attorneys: A Socio-Legal Study of Nganjuk Rengga Yudha Santoso; Niken Nidia Putri; Kurnia Febiana; Adhitya Ahmad Zainuri; Anizar Wahyu Cahyani
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Vol. 17 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/jsh.v17i2.26788

Abstract

  This study analyzes the implementation of the State Attorney's (Jaksa Pengacara Negara/JPN) function in credit mediation at the Nganjuk District Prosecutor's Office, specifically regarding constitutional legal consciousness and citizen protection. Employing a qualitative socio-legal approach, this study involved 24 informants selected through purposive sampling—debtors (N=12), debtor's family (N=3), JPNs (N=4), BRI representatives (N=3), and academics/advocates (N=2)—through in-depth interviews, complemented by observation and documentary analysis. Data were analyzed thematically; credibility was strengthened through triangulation and member checking. Findings reveal significant ambiguity among debtors regarding the Prosecutor's Office's status and function in mediation, often mistakenly perceived as a criminal process. The symbolic power of the Prosecutor's Office, even in a civil capacity, was perceived by debtors as pressure that undermined their sense of voluntariness in mediation; this reflects perceived symbolic pressure rather than evidence of actual legal coercion. Asymmetric legal consciousness was also identified, with debtors having limited or confused understanding of the JPN's role, in contrast to JPNs and BRI who understood the JPN's civil mandate. Although the JPN's involvement is legally recognized, its implementation raised questions about constitutional legitimacy concerning citizen protection, interpreted here cautiously from informants' accounts. This study extends theories of state power and constitutional legal consciousness by positioning institutional role ambiguity and symbolic power as complementary mechanisms shaping citizens' perceptions in civil disputes. The implication is a need for reconstructing JPN practice to be more citizen-oriented, emphasizing transparency, debtor rights education, and independent complaint mechanisms to strengthen citizen protection and ensure fair, voluntary mediation.
KIP Kuliah dan Cyclical Dependency: Analisis Sosiologi Pendidikan atas Mental Kolonisasi dalam Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Rengga Yudha Santoso; Titis Noerhapsari Moelyono; Anisa Prastiwi; Mayeva Wulandari; Amel Arelsta Putri
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Science and Knowledge Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): IJISK 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Pendidikan Ilmu Keguruan, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/ijisk.v3i4.747

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis interaksi antara kebijakan Kartu Indonesia Pintar (KIP) Kuliah, perilaku mahasiswa, dan pemahaman hak konstitusional, serta mengidentifikasi peran ketergantungan siklis dan mental kolonisasi dalam pemanfaatan bantuan tersebut. Masalah penelitian berangkat dari fenomena “cek ombak”, yaitu perilaku menunda pendaftaran atau memilih drop out awal sambil menunggu kepastian status KIP Kuliah, yang mengindikasikan pergeseran makna bantuan dari hak konstitusional menjadi belas kasihan. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran sekuensial eksplanatori (KUAN→kual): data kuantitatif dikumpulkan dari 187 mahasiswa penerima KIP Kuliah di Universitas PGRI Mpu Sindok melalui kuesioner daring, kemudian diperdalam melalui wawancara mendalam dan diskusi kelompok terfokus. Hasil menunjukkan tingkat pemahaman mahasiswa terhadap KIP Kuliah sebagai hak konstitusional berada pada kategori sedang, dengan korelasi positif signifikan terhadap perilaku pengelolaan keuangan (r=0,38, p<0,01) dan strategi adaptasi (r=0,25, p<0,05), sementara korelasinya dengan motivasi akademik tidak signifikan. Temuan kualitatif memperkuat pola ini: mahasiswa yang memaknai bantuan sebagai 'belas kasihan' menunjukkan mental kolonisasi berupa relasi patron-klien dan berkurangnya otonomi finansial, sedangkan pola “cek ombak” yang berulang pada 2025–2026 berkelindan dengan menurunnya motivasi akademik. Studi ini memperluas model konstitusional kewarganegaraan pendidikan dengan menempatkan mental kolonisasi dan ketergantungan siklis sebagai mekanisme sosial yang memoderasi efektivitas kebijakan bantuan. Kata kunci: KIP Kuliah, ketergantungan siklis, mental kolonisasi, hak konstitusional, sosiologi pendidikan. Abstract This study analyzed the interaction between the Kartu Indonesia Pintar (KIP) Kuliah policy, student behavior, and students' understanding of constitutional rights, while identifying the roles of cyclical dependency and colonial mentality in aid utilization. The research stemmed from the “waiting game” (cek ombak) phenomenon — deferring registration or opting for early dropout while awaiting KIP Kuliah confirmation — signaling a shift from constitutional right to charity. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN→qual) was employed: quantitative data were collected from 187 recipients at Universitas PGRI Mpu Sindok, then deepened through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Students' understanding of KIP Kuliah as a constitutional right falls in the moderate category, with significant positive correlations to financial management behavior (r=0.38, p<0.01) and adaptation strategies (r=0.25, p<0.05), while the correlation with academic motivation was not significant. Qualitative findings reinforce this pattern: students who frame the aid as charity display colonial mentality marked by patron-client relations and diminished financial autonomy, while the recurring waiting-game pattern in 2025–2026 is associated with declining academic motivation. This study extends the constitutional model of educational citizenship by positioning colonial mentality and cyclical dependency as social mechanisms that moderate aid policy effectiveness. Keywords : KIP Kuliah, cyclical dependency, colonial mentality, constitutional rights, sociology of education.
Legal Challenges of Cross-Border Environmental Harm: State Responsibility and the Development of International Environmental Law Rengga Yudha Santoso; Syimir Asyraaf Bin Eddie Halim; YunHaoChuang
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 2 No 1 (2026): : September: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/f006gs30

Abstract

Cross-border environmental harm presents legal difficulties when cumulative environmental injury involves multiple contributors, overlapping obligations, and uncertain causal relationships. Existing scholarship addresses prevention, attribution, and remedies extensively but provides insufficient methodological integration across conventional transboundary pollution and global environmental harm. This study examines the interaction between primary environmental obligations and the secondary rules of State responsibility. A normative-doctrinal approach evaluates treaties, International Law Commission instruments, and selected international jurisprudence through September 2026, applying structured legal interpretation and comparative analysis. Particular attention is given to the 2024 ITLOS and 2025 Inter-American Court and ICJ climate advisory opinions. The findings establish that the no-harm principle and due diligence remain complementary preventive obligations, while contemporary jurisprudence clarifies their application to cumulative environmental risks. Attribution of State conduct must be distinguished from scientific causation, legal causation, and allocation of compensable injury. Concurrent environmental and human-rights obligations do not automatically establish jurisdiction, procedural standing, or proportional liability. The study develops a four-stage doctrinal framework separating primary obligations, breach and conduct attribution, causal contribution and allocation, and invocation of responsibility and remedies. This framework provides a systematic method for evaluating complex environmental responsibility while distinguishing established legal requirements from unresolved questions of collective causation and reparation