Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamic Review : Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman Qisth: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Mohsi Mohsi
Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Fiqh al-Tasamuh dalam Hukum Perdata Islam: Mewujudkan Moderasi dalam Relasi Sosial dan Keluarga di Era Kontemporer Mohsi Mohsi
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/2b8qg417

Abstract

The contemporary era is marked by rapid social change, digitalized relationships, and increasingly complex interactions within both society and families. In this context, Fiqh al-Tasamuh (Islamic jurisprudence of tolerance) offers a relevant normative framework for fostering inclusive, just, and harmonious social and familial life. Core values such as tawassuth (moderation), i’tidal (balance), tawazun (proportionality), and tasamuh (tolerance) have proven effective in addressing modern challenges—ranging from social media use within households and strengthening interfaith relationships to reforming family law based on the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah). Recent studies indicate that this moderate approach not only reduces domestic conflicts but also promotes social coexistence amid diverse identities. Despite resistance from conservative groups and digital polarization, fiqh al-tasamuh presents a contextual and progressive ethical-legal response. By enhancing moderate religious literacy, fostering collaboration between religious figures and the state, and integrating tasamuh values in family education, societies can cultivate a more peaceful and equitable civilization. Thus, fiqh al-tasamuh is not merely a theoretical discourse but a practical tool for navigating the moral and legal complexities of the modern world.
Kebebasan Berekspresi di Media Sosial: Dialektika Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Islam dalam Pembentukan Regulasi Digital Gufron Zainal Abidin Sdawi Manasiq; Mohsi Mohsi; Hammis Syafaq; Fahmi Assulthoni; Abd Ghani
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/qfmm9k86

Abstract

The normative regulation of freedom of expression on social media platforms remains unresolved, particularly in Muslim-majority countries that simultaneously operate under international Human Rights (HR) frameworks and Islamic Law principles. Available comparative scholarship tends to address this issue in general terms, without examining its specific implications within digital ecosystems. Drawing on a qualitative-comparative approach grounded in document analysis, this study examines international HR instruments specifically Article 19 of the UDHR and ICCPR alongside Islamic normative sources comprising the Qur'an, Sunnah, fatwa council rulings, and maqasid al-shari'ah literature. Both systems recognize freedom of expression as a fundamental right, yet differ substantially in philosophical foundation. HR frameworks condition restrictions on the principles of legality, legitimate aim, necessity, and proportionality; Islamic Law, by contrast, frames expression as a moral trust bounded by the protection of maqasid al-shari'ah and the principle of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar. This tension produces concrete regulatory gaps in digital content moderation, particularly regarding hate speech, blasphemy, and disinformation. In response to these gaps, the study proposes a three-component integrative regulatory model: balanced cyber-regulation design, multi-stakeholder co-regulation mechanisms, and digital literacy grounded in cross-perspectival communication ethics. The model offers an operational framework for policymakers and digital platforms seeking to develop fair and contextually sensitive content moderation policies.
Integrating Kyai’s Authority into Sharia Mediation: A Socio-Legal Approach to Legal Pluralism and Family Law Harmony in Madura Mohsi Mohsi; Muchlis Muchlis; Fahmi Assulthoni
Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman Vol 15 No 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Mafapress - Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) IPMAFA Pati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35878/islamicreview.v15i1.2203

Abstract

This study investigates the pivotal role of the Kyai in Sharia mediation and the integration of their religious authority with the Indonesian national legal system within family law disputes in Madura. Utilizing a qualitative socio-legal approach, the research explores the dynamics of legal pluralism and the harmonization between Sharia and state law. The findings reveal that while the Madurese community predominantly favors Sharia mediation led by Kyais due to high social trust, these religious figures do not operate in isolation from formal law. Instead, Kyais actively bridge the gap by considering state legal frameworks, particularly in protecting women’s rights during divorce and inheritance disputes. This study proposes the concept of "religious authority-based legal pluralism," where Kyais act as socio-legal mediators who negotiate and reinterpret the relationship between religious norms and formal statutes. The research concludes that moderate legal integration, facilitated by local authorities, is essential for creating equitable, socially acceptable, and legally valid solutions in multicultural societies.
Co-Authors Abd Ghani Fahmi Assulthoni Fahmi Assulthoni Hammis Syafaq Muchlis Muchlis Sdawi Manasiq, Gufron Zainal Abidin