<![CDATA[Reflective thinking requires learners to examine experience, justify decisions, and revise understanding, yet evidence on local-wisdom-based learning often combines reflective thinking with adjacent constructs such as critical thinking, creativity, literacy, and achievement. This study presents a construct-sensitive audit and structured narrative synthesis of a previously assembled 2022–2026 corpus. The available corpus contains 20 reports, but the original source-specific search counts, final search date, deduplication log, and stage-specific exclusion reasons were not retained; therefore, the identification stage is not reconstructed as a reproducible de novo systematic review. All 20 reports were reclassified using explicit construct-alignment rules into two direct-evidence studies, nine related-evidence journal articles, eight contextual reflective-thinking studies, and one conference-series protocol deviation. The two direct studies reported favorable developmental or application results, but both designs limit causal inference. Across related evidence, local wisdom most consistently operated as an authentic problem source, cultural frame, or contextual learning resource, whereas contextual reflective-thinking studies showed both positive and non-significant findings. The synthesis therefore supports a cautious proposition: local wisdom may facilitate reflective learning when cultural experience is explicitly connected to metacognitive prompts, justification, and reflective assessment, but current evidence is preliminary rather than conclusive. Because the original screening audit trail and formal risk-of-bias records are unavailable, the study should be interpreted as a transparent corpus audit and evidence synthesis. Future research should use preregistered protocols, reproducible search logs, independent screening, design-appropriate appraisal, and construct-specific outcomes.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
