<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to examine the violation of the code of ethics commited by an advocate. The formulation of the problem raised in this study regarding violations of the code of ethics is included in the case 0f Frederich Yunadi. The code of ethics that was violated included violations of the obligations carried out by advocates when carrying out their duties, both outside and inside the court. This code of ethics exists because it aims to ensure that advocates can carry out their profession properly, then be responsible, and can maintain and improve the professionalism of their profession. Research related to this issue uses a normative legal method, with data sources including primary and secondary data, such as books, documents, journals and other literature. The data collection technique used was a literature study, namely reviewing various written information regarding professional ethics and law from relevant sources and widely published, according to the needs of normative legal research. Violations of the advocate’s code of ethics, such as in the case of Frederich Yunadi, show that advocates have an obligation to protect the rights and interests of clients. The case of Frederich Yunadi sjows a serious violation of the advocate’s code of ethics in Indonesia. This reflects a lack of integrity and professionalism in legal practice.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
